Skip to main content

iRubric: IED 4.1.4 Product Improvement rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

IED 4.1.4 Product Improvement

Rubric Code: L4X469

By gduquette

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Engineering

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Enter rubric title Enter rubric description
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent (N/A)
Brainstorming 1 pts Enter criteria description	Poor Student worked using few strategies of a brainstorm session and came up with few ideas to research	Fair Student worked using some of the strategies of a brainstorm session and came up with a few ideas to research	Good Student worked using the strategies of a brainstorm session and came up with a list of ideas to research	Excellent Student worked using the strategies of a brainstorm session and came up with a sizable list of ideas to research
Research 1 pts Enter criteria description	Poor The student researched 5-6 ideas and used the eng. notebook to describe and annote their notebooks with poor organization.	Fair The student researched 5-6 ideas and used the eng. notebook to describe and annote their notebooks with some lack of organization.	Good The student researched 5-6 ideas and used the eng. notebook to describe and annote their notebooks	Excellent The student researched 5-6 ideas and organization of research and annotations were excellent
Sketches 2 pts Enter criteria description	Poor The team sketched and annoted less than 5-6 ideas from the research they completed. The link between the sketch and research non-existant	Fair The team sketched and annoted 5-6 ideas from the research they completed. The link between the sketch and research is weak	Good The team sketched and annoted 5-6 ideas from the research they completed. The link between the sketch and research is there.	Excellent The team sketched and annoted 5-6 ideas from the research they completed. The link between the sketch and research is very strong.
Dimensioned sketches 2 pts	Poor The sketches are neatly drawn with proper dimensioning rules followed. The product can be built with no modifications	Fair The sketches are neatly drawn with proper dimensioning rules followed. The product can be built with no modifications	Good The sketches are neatly drawn with proper dimensioning rules followed. The product can be built with no modifications	Excellent The sketches are neatly drawn with proper dimensioning rules followed. The product can be built with no modifications
Design Matrix 1 pts	Poor The team completed a design matrix with less than 5-6 ideas and less than 5 criteria	Fair The team completed a design matrix with 5-6 ideas and at least 5 criteria.	Good The team completed a design matrix with 5-6 ideas and at least 5 criteria. The team made conclusions.	Excellent The team completed a design matrix with 5-6 ideas and at least 5 criteria. They filled out the chart and made excellent conclusions.
Inventor parts 3 pts	Poor The parts are not at all completed in inventor. They are also not dimensioned in a drawing file.	Fair The parts are partially completed in inventor. They are also partially dimensioned in a drawing file.	Good The parts are fully completed in inventor. They are also fully dimensioned in a drawing file showing some understanding of the rules of dimensioning.	Excellent The parts are fully completed in inventor. They are also fully dimensioned in a drawing file showing an excellent understanding of the rules of dimensioning.
Inventor assembly 2 pts	Poor The new parts are not incorporated in the design and not assembled in an assembly file.	Fair The new parts are partially incorporated in the design and partially assembled in an assembly file.	Good The new parts are partially incorporated in the design and fully assembled in an assembly file.	Excellent The new parts are incorporated in the design and fully assembled in an assembly file.
Presentation file 1 pts	Poor Presentation file is not completed	Fair The new assembly is not well tweaked and not properly ballooned in a presentation file and does not contain a part list	Good The new assembly is tweaked and properly ballooned in a presentation file Contains a part list	Excellent The new assembly is well tweaked and properly ballooned in a presentation file. Contains a part list
Report 1 pts	Poor The report had few required elements.	Fair The report had some required elements.	Good The report had most required elements.	Excellent The report was turned in with all required elements
Work ethic 1 pts	Poor The student did not work well with partner and made no effort	Fair The student did not work well with partner and lack of effort	Good The student worked well with partner. Mostly on task and made an effort	Excellent The student worked extremely well with his/her partner. Always on task and made his/her best attempt.

Subjects:

Engineering

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Engineering rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n224