Skip to main content

iRubric: Gregs Lit and Math rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Gregs Lit and Math

Rubric Code: L36258

By USTmath

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Math

Type: (Other)

Grade Levels: K-5, 6-8, 9-12, Undergraduate

Gregs Lit and Math book review Assess the value of a book used to promote math and literature
	Poor Little or no value 1 pts	Fair positive value, but consider others 2 pts	Good definitely consider this book 3 pts
Book availablity What's the possibility this book will be available for the classroom considering cost and distribution.	Poor Not available in a timely manner	Fair Reasonably Available	Good Immediately Avaiable
Supports lesson’s math objectives Book supports students' achieving math lesson's objective.	Poor Not appropriate for this objective - possibly has a negative impact.	Fair Indirectly supports math objective.	Good Direct Support.
Supports cross-discipline objective Book extends learning to another discipline.	Poor No cross-discipline advantages.	Fair Indirectly supports cross-discipline learning.	Good Definite and specific support in a cross-discipline.
Compliance with Math Standards	Poor Several areas of non-compliance.	Fair Non-compliances are few. Waivers can be approved.	Good Perfectly Compliant.
Compliance with Lit Sta	Poor Several areas of non-compliance.	Fair Non-compliances are few. Waivers can be approved.	Good Perfectly Compliant
Math Integrity: Components accurate	Poor Math content is inaccurate, vague or misleading.	Fair Math content is appropriately accurate.	Good Math content is accurate - reinforcing and extending previous concepts.
Math Integrity: Reflect functional use in believable context	Poor the reader will either definitely reject as untrue, the application of math in this context - or worse - blindly accept it as true.	Fair the reader with some minimal effort can see the math at work in the story.	Good the reader will be immediately drawn into the context and is confident in the math at work.
Math Integrity: Ideas and concepts accessible to readers	Poor the reader will be unprepared and reject the ideas and concepts.	Fair the reader, with some effort, may comprehend the ideas and concepts.	Good the reader will comprehend the ideas and concepts and be able to extend them.
Invite Varied Response: Invitational	Poor the book will never engage a sizeable number of students in an active learning experience.	Fair the majority of readers will be engaged by the invitational qualities, however a sizeable minority of students will need additional encouragement.	Good the book will draw almost every student into the story.
Invite Varied Response: Non-Didactic Tone	Poor The book invites no more varied response than a standard math text.	Fair the book is mostly non-didactic. The areas where it is didactic will not cause readers to remove themselves from the story.	Good The book is completely non-dicatic and appropriately so.
Promote Aesthetic Response Well-crafted language	Poor No attempt in crafting the language. Loss of pertinent learning opportunities.	Fair Language is largely well-crafted, yet there are areas where it is not and a few where the well-crafted language is unnecessary (excessive)	Good Book is well-crafted in every regard. Students will recognize and appreciate the effort.
Promote Aesthetic Response Compelling artistic dimension to accompanying learning aids.	Poor The supporting illustrations, etc. are minimal, confusing or distract the reader from the story and the math content.	Fair Supporting illustrations, etc are appropriate, do not interfer with learning - yet lacks the attraction the story demands.	Good The illustrations supplement the story and math in ways the reader expects and admires.
Promote Aesthetic Response Heightened awareness of form or design	Poor The book has little sense of form or design that the student will appreciate.	Fair The book has some sense of form or design, yet there are contrivances and/or areas where the reader demands more and is let down.	Good The book seamlessly brings math content into the story as though it were always there to begin with.
Inclusiveness: Promotes Gender, Ethnic and Cultural Inclusiveness	Poor The book has at least one instance which excludes readers from the story based on gender, ethnic or cultural background.	Fair The book has no instances which excludes readers from the story based on gender, ethnic or cultural background. It promotes inclusion only as an afterthought.	Good The actively promotes inclusion throughout the book in a natural manner consistent with the book's story.

Subjects:

Math

Types:

(Other)

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Math rubrics

More (Other) rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n243