iRubric: EAD 863- Group 2: Collaborative rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

EAD 863- Group 2: Collaborative

Criteria for evaluating collaborative

Rubric Code: L23A89

By embeene

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: (General)

Type: (Other)

Grade Levels: (none)

Desired Criteria Rate the criterion by circling (1) evaluation per row
	Non-existent in Program 0 pts	Needs Extensive Improvement 5 pts	Developing 7.5 pts	Secure 10 pts
Logistical Preparation 5 % room set up; technology check (lights, equipment); materials check; back-up activity	Non-existent in Program	Needs Extensive Improvement	Developing	Secure
Content Preparation 5 % states goals; planned activities/ group work; transitions/ questions/ length	Non-existent in Program	Needs Extensive Improvement	Developing	Secure
Power & Ownership Balance 15 % Role of teacher in classroom is facilitative, not lecture: observes and gives prompt and appropriate feedback; emphasis on “no right” answers; high expectations; students have a level of control for their own learning	Non-existent in Program	Needs Extensive Improvement	Developing	Secure
Content 15 % Topic related to subject matter; repeated exposure to content through different senses (modalities); opportunity for discovery/ exploration of the content	Non-existent in Program	Needs Extensive Improvement	Developing	Secure
Activities 15 % Students are active – “doing” – reading/ discussing/ writing/ etc; case/problem is analyzed/solved; Opportunities for students to practice problem solving or skill at hand; students use higher order thinking skills; Appropriate time balance between process and content; Notice/ updates given so groups can manage time	Non-existent in Program	Needs Extensive Improvement	Developing	Secure
Group Process 15 % Individuals grouped with purpose: diversity, small group- appropriate size (3-7); clear directions; collaborative “rules” set up to foster improved opportunities for dialogical learning; respects diverse talents and ways of knowing;all members included and involved/ participatory	Non-existent in Program	Needs Extensive Improvement	Developing	Secure
Social meaning-making 15 % Opportunities for social mutual meaning-making through exploration and feedback: explore own attitudes, behaviors, experiences, thoughts, values (POV)	Non-existent in Program	Needs Extensive Improvement	Developing	Secure
Reflection/ Evaluation 15 % Time for “group processing” to examine inner-group action/ activities; self-evaluation; peer-evaluation; promotes praxis, process of reflection moves to action level of learning	Non-existent in Program	Needs Extensive Improvement	Developing	Secure
Summary % Points for each column x weight (%)
Summary % Evaluation 100 % Overall evaluation details	Non-existent in Program <70% Way too many "one person" groups; "what were they supposed to be doing?"	Needs Extensive Improvement 71-80% Completed activities but many areas of improvement noted. If you need tips, check out team 2's logs.	Developing 81-90% Decent job. However, as an adult, is "decent" good enough?	Secure 91-100% Are you Group 2? Excellent.

Keywords:

Collaborative

Subjects:

(General)

Types:

(Other)

Discuss this rubric