iRubric: Economic Indicators Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Economic Indicators Project

Year 13 Economics Research Barriers to development: Three part project

Rubric Code: L232283

By stephenbcobb

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Business

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate, Graduate, Post Graduate

Criterion
	Poor 0-1 (N/A)	Fair 2-3 (N/A)	Good 4-5 (N/A)	Excellent 6-7 (N/A)
Content & Development 40 %	Poor Content is incomplete. Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.	Fair Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive. Major points are addressed, but not well supported. Some time has been spent on answering questions, but insufficient. Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.	Good Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive. Major points are stated clearly and are well supported. Time and thought have been clearly demonstrated with answers to questions. Content and purpose of the writing are clear.	Excellent Answers demonstrate supreme understanding of the material and show thorough deliberation and are of the highest quality.
Economic Indicators 50 %	Poor Paper contains only 1-2 of the 7 indicators listed with no additional indicators and no examples	Fair Paper contains only 3 - 4 of the 7 points given and 1-3 of the additional indicators with limited examples	Good Paper contains 5 -6 of the of the 7 indicators given and 3-4 of the additional indicators and some examples.	Excellent All economic indicators listed in the assignment are addressed and all additional indicators are present with multiple examples given.
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling 10 %	Poor Presentation contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. Is not well-written.	Fair Presentation contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors. Answers lack clarity or not fully edited.	Good Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct. Language is clear and precise, but could be better; Thoughts are well-articulated, but not crisp and of excellent quality.	Excellent Short answers demonstrate proper grammar, spelling, punctuation and clearly demonstrate time has been spent to provide high quality output.