- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Greek Mythology Final Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Greek Mythology Final Project Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text. Rubric Code: L229393 By wehess3 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Assessment Grade Levels: 9-12

Greek Mythology Final Project
	Advanced 4 pts 4 pts	Proficient 3 pts 3 pts	Developing 2 pts 2 pts	Emerging 1 pt 1 pts
Digital Media SL.9-10.5	Advanced 4 pts I can create my own unique source of digital media (e.g., textual, graphical, audio, visual, and interactive elements) in presentations to enhance understanding of findings, reasoning, and evidence and to add interest.	Proficient 3 pts I can make strategic use of digital media (e.g., textual, graphical, audio, visual, and interactive elements) in presentations to enhance understanding of findings, reasoning, and evidence and to add interest.	Developing 2 pts I can make use of digital media (e.g., textual, graphical, audio, visual, and interactive elements) in presentations to display an understanding of findings, reasoning, and evidence. However, my presentation was not clear in parts because of small font or color usage.	Emerging 1 pt I can make use of digital media but it was missing textual, or graphical or audio, in presentations and it does not display an understanding of findings, reasoning, and evidence. My presentation was also not clear in parts because of small font or color usage
Textual Evidence 9.RL.01	Advanced 4 pts I can create a character sketch and 10 cite pieces of strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text. I can also connect each piece of evidence to other real-world examples.	Proficient 3 pts I can create a character sketch and cite 9 - 8 pieces of strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.	Developing 2 pts I can create a character sketch and cite 7-6 pieces of textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says but the evidence is weak and the explanation of the evidence may be incomplete or unclear.	Emerging 1 pt I can create a character sketch and cite 6 or less pieces of textual evidence that supports implied answers to the questions. However, the evidence is excessively weak and no explanation of the evidence is given.