- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Cycle candidate presentation/speech rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Cycle candidate presentation/speech Rubric Code: KXAA46A By nmorales Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Science Type: (Other) Grade Levels: (none)

Enter rubric title
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
mudslinging	Excellent Smear campaigns include: o* smear campaign presented against EACH of the other cycles * 2-3 convincing arguments presented against EACH of the other cycles * provided teacher w/ list of all “smears	Good Smear campaigns are provided for most cycles, but not all	Fair One or more smear campaigns are missing and campaigns are weak in their attempt to disrepute the opponent.	Poor Little or no effort of research and work is evident
campaign speech	Excellent Includes all of the following: o complete description of each step of the cycle: * links steps to each other * provides helpful visual aids * comparison to other cycles * convincing argument of WHY it’s the most important cycle * Links importance of cycle to living things,, ecosystem and/or world in a convincing way * deflects mudslinging attacks from other	Good Includes partial descriptions of requirements for advanced. (six out of seven)	Fair Missing some requirements for advanced or very poor descriptions of requirements.(three to five of the items from the list	Poor Little or no effort of research and work is evident.(one to two items from the list
creativity	Excellent LOTS of creativity used in ALL parts of the campaign, including the materials used in the campaign	Good Creativity used in some parts and not others, including the materials used in the campaign	Fair Very little creativity used, including the materials used in the campaign	Poor No creativity is evident, including the materials used in the campaign
teamwork	Excellent All group members equally participated in all portions of the assignment and can justify which portions they contributed to	Good All group members contributed to the project but not equally as shown in the justification	Fair One or more group members did not contribute to the project as shown in justification	Poor Two or more group members did not contribute to the project as shown in justification