iRubric: Engineering Ethics - Response paper rubric

The writer uses no or little evidence from the ethical principles and tests to back up their ideas. Does not have a clear central idea or does not respond appropriately to the<BR>
assignment. The piece is too short in length. There are few details and/or no or few relevant details included in the writing.

The writer uses some evidence from ethical principles and tests to back up their ideas. Presents central idea in general terms.<BR>
Usually does not acknowledge other<BR>
views. The piece is an acceptable length and includes some details.

The writer uses sufficient evidence to back up their ideas. Clearly<BR>
states the central idea, but may<BR>
have minor lapses in development.<BR>
The piece is an appropriate length. Some details are used to back up the writer's ideas.

The writer effectively uses evidence to back up their ideas. Central<BR>
idea is clearly communicated, follows a logical sequence.<BR>
The piece is an appropriate length. Many details are used to back up the writer's ideas.

Many spelling and grammar mistakes are evident. Some of these mistakes interfere with the meaning and understanding of the piece.

5-9 spelling and grammar mistakes are evident. These mistakes do not interfere with the understanding of the piece.

Few or no spelling and grammar mistakes are evident. These mistakes do not interfere with the understanding of the piece.

No spelling or grammar mistakes are evident. There is nothing that interfered with the understanding of the piece.