Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Graphic Design Portfolio rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Graphic Design Portfolio
End of Year Portfolio Review
Assessment of digital portfolio and presentation
Rubric Code:
KX98A4X
By
Inknstein
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Arts and Design
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
1st year Portfolio Presentation
Poor
(N/A)
Fair
(N/A)
Good
(N/A)
Excellent
(N/A)
Organization and Layout
Poor
There is no clear plan for the organization of information. Most materials are missing labels or labels are not clear.
Fair
Some information is logically sequenced. An occasional slide or item of information seems out of place. Some materials are missing labels or are not clear.
Good
Most information is organized in a clear, logical way. Once slide or item of information seems out of place. Most materials are labeled appropriately and in a clear and concise manner
Excellent
Information is organized in a clear, logical way. It is easy to anticipate the type of material that might be on the next slide. All materials are labeled appropriately and in a clear and concise manner.
Attractiveness of Portfolio
Poor
Us of font, color, graphics, effects etc. but these often distract from the presentation content.
Fair
Makes use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. but occasionally these detract from the presentation content.
Good
Makes good use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance the presentation.
Excellent
Makes excellent use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance the presentation
Content
Poor
Content is minimal or there are several factual errors.
Fair
Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1 - 2 factual errors.
Good
Includes essential knowledge about the topic, Subject knowledge appears to be good.
Excellent
Covers topics in-depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent.
Preparedness
Poor
Student does not seem at all prepared to present. It was hard to tell what the topics were.
Fair
The student is somewhat prepared, but it is clear that rehearsal was lacking. Stays on topic some (89% -75%) of the time.
Good
Student seems pretty prepared but might have needed a couple more rehearsals. Stays on topic most (99%-90%) of the time.
Excellent
Student is completely prepared and has obviously rehearsed. Stays on topic all (100%) of the time.
Comprehension
Poor
Student is unable to accurately answer questions posed by the faculty about the topics.
Fair
Student is able to accurately answer a few questions posed by the faculty about the topics.
Good
Student is able to accurately answer most questions posed by the faculty and the topics.
Excellent
Student is able to accurately answer almost all questions posed by the faculty abut the topics.
Presentation
Poor
Often mumbles or can not be understood OR mispronounces more than one word. Uses several (5 or more) words or phrases that are not appropriate for the presentation. Rarely speaks in complete sentences.
Fair
Speaks clearly and distinctly most (94%-85%) of the time. Mispronounces no more than one word. Uses vocabulary appropriate for the presentation. Sometimes (70%-80%) speaks in complete sentences
Good
Speaks clearly and distinctly all (100%-95%) of the time, but mispronounces one word. Uses vocabulary appropriate for the presentation. Mostly (80%-98%) speaks in complete sentences.
Excellent
Speaks clearly and distinctly all (100%-95%) the time, and mispronounces no words. Uses vocabulary appropriate for the presentation. Always (99%-100%) speaks in complete sentences.
Effort
Poor
Work reflects very little effort on the part of the student.
Fair
Work reflects some effort from the student.
Good
Work reflects a strong effort from the student.
Excellent
Work reflects this student's best efforts.
Attire/Grooming
Poor
General attire is not appropriate for presentation (dirty, ripped, stained). Grooming is non existent. Slouches and/or does not look at people during the presentation.
Fair
Casual attire, somewhat appropriate but was wrinkled or disheveled. Grooming needs work. Sometimes stands up straight and establishes eye contact.
Good
Casual attire, mostly appropriate for the presentation. Grooming is done, but is in need of some attention. Stands up straight and establishes eye contact with everyone in the room during the presentation.
Excellent
Attire is appropriate for an interview or presentation, very professional look. Well groomed. Stands up straight, looks relaxed and confident. Establishes eye contact with everyone in the room during the presentation.
Subjects:
Arts and Design
Types:
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Arts and Design rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.