Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Pharmacy Case Presentation rubric

iRubric: Pharmacy Case Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Pharmacy Case Presentation Oral Presentation Evaluation Rubric Code: KX96795 By Ginawillard Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Medical Type: Presentation Grade Levels: Graduate

Case Presentation
	Excellent 5 pts	Good 4 pts	Average 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Presentation Style 15 % Does the student/resident present with confidence, enthusiasm, and professionalism using an appropriate volume, rate, and smooth transitions?	Excellent The student/resident appears confident, enthusiastic, professional, makes excellent eye contact and voice projection. Delivers presentation at appropriate volume and rate using relevant terminology.	Good The student/resident appears confident, enthusiastic, professional, makes good eye contact and voice projection. Delivers presentation at appropriate volume and rate using relevant terminology.	Average The student/resident appears somewhat confident and enthusiastic while making good eye contact but presentation is delivered with some mispronunciation or misuse of terminology. Difficult to hear at times.	Fair The student/resident appears nervous and has minimal eye contact. Presentation is delivered with mispronunciation of terminology and occasional use of ah, um, or other slang. Difficult to hear at times.	Poor The student/resident does not make eye contact with the audience and appears unenthusiastic. Presentation is delivered with frequent use of slang and repeated mispronunciation of words. The student was unprofessional.
Presentation Format 15 % The student/resident will present a pediatric patient case that will include the patient's history, laboratory exams/test, diagnosis, disease state review, disease state guidelines (if available), medication review and plan. The case should be pertinent to pediatric pharmacy practice.	Excellent Presentation included an actual patient case and includes all specified sections. No spelling/grammar errors.	Good Presentation contains most of the specified guidelines. Patient case contains most pertinent information. No spelling/grammar errors.	Average Presentation meets most of the specified guidelines. Patient case is missing pertinent information and/or contains a spelling/grammar error.	Fair Presentation does not meet most of the specified guidelines or there was inadequate patient information presented. Few spelling/grammar errors.	Poor Presentation meets few of the specified guidelines or not based on an actual patient or missing significant patient case details. Many spelling/grammar errors.
Powerpoint 15 % Slides are organized: graphics and formatting use are relevant and used to present material in a organized manner.	Excellent The student has a well organized PowerPoint presentation, proper formatting and strong graphic representations.	Good The student has an well organized PowerPoint presentation with one formatting issue.	Average Well organized presentation of information containing a few formatting issues.	Fair Presentation was not well organized and/or several formatting issues.	Poor Presentation was not organized and many formatting issues. Needs help with PowerPoint use.
Time Limit/References 15 % The presentation should meet the time limit guidelines (30-45 min) The presentation should contain Accurate reference citations for slides and appropriate use of pertinent literature.	Excellent The presentation met the maximum time limit. Accurate citations. Appropriate literature use.	Good The presentation fell within the time limit. Accurate citations. One missing or inappropriate literature source.	Average The presentation met the minimum time limit but did not contain proper citation of slides. One missing or inappropriate literature source.	Fair The presentation exceeded the maximum time limit. Several of the slides did not contain proper citation. A few missing or inappropriate literature sources.	Poor The presentation fell short of the minimum time limit. All slides missing proper citation. Several missing or inappropriate literature sources.
Content 20 % The patient case should be relevant to pediatric pharmacy practice, organized and logical, and address learning objectives appropriately.	Excellent The information is well organized and logical and relevant to pediatric pharmacy practice. The objectives are appropriate and addressed.	Good The information is well organized and logical and relevant to pediatric pharmacy practice. One objective is either not appropriate or addressed.	Average The information is well organized but it does not remain focused. One or more objectives are either not appropriate or addressed.	Fair Too much information presented. The information is not organized in a logical manner, does not remain focused. Objectives are not appropriate or all addressed.	Poor Not enough information presented. The information is not organized in a logical manner, does not remain focused. Objectives not appropriate or all addressed. The case is not relevant to pediatric pharmacy practice.
Conclusion 20 % The student/resident must be able to answer questions effectively, demonstrate adequate patient assessment and care plan (safety, efficacy, cost). The primary literature should be adequately summarized and statistical and clinical significance determined appropriately.	Excellent The patient assessment and plan is appropriate and considers all pertinent factors. The literature is significant and relevant. The student is able to answer all questions.	Good The patient assessment and plan is appropriate and considers all pertinent factors. The literature is significant and relevant. The student is able to answer most questions.	Average The patient assessment and plan is incomplete. The literature is lacking significance and/or relevance. The student is able to answer most questions.	Fair The patient assessment and plan is incomplete. The literature is lacking significance and/or relevance. The student is able to answer few questions.	Poor The patient assessment and plan is not appropriate. The literature is not significant and/or relevant. The student is unable to answer questions.

Subjects:

Medical

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Medical rubrics

More Presentation rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n16