iRubric: New Hires rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

New Hires

New hires are interviewed, teach a lesson and are evaluated by a few selected students and the hiring committee.

Rubric Code: KX5AB68

By amarialee

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: (General)

Type: (Other)

Grade Levels: (none)

New Hires
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts
Professionalism	Poor Candidate showed little to no professionalism. EVIDENCE:	Fair Candidate was professional with dress and with response to questions asked. EVIDENCE:	Good Candidate was prepared for interview with questions, clear responses and dressed appropriately. EVIDENCE:
Student Centered	Poor Candidate seemed to be focused on other aspects of the job and focused little on the students. EVIDENCE:	Fair Candidate was focused on students but did not seem to put real life connections between subject matter and the real world. EVIDENCE:	Good Candidate was for the students. His/her responses were student centered and seemed to take the subject matter and create a real world connection. EVIDENCE:
Teaching Experience	Poor Candidate has no teaching experience EVIDENCE:	Fair Candidate has less than 4 years of teaching experience EVIDENCE:	Good Candidate has 5-7 years of teaching experience EVIDENCE:
Curriculum Base	Poor Candidate has no experience with any curriculum. EVIDENCE:	Fair Candidate has little to some experience with curriculum. EVIDENCE:	Good Candidate has an array of experience with curriculum. EVIDENCE:
Interest in TAP	Poor Candidate did not seem interested in TAP. EVIDENCE:	Fair Candidate seemed a bit interested in TAP. EVIDENCE:	Good Candidate seemed interested in TAP and what the TAP had to offer the students. EVIDENCE:
Work History	Poor Candidate has no work history in arts eduction. EVIDENCE:	Fair Candidate has limited work history in arts education. EVIDENCE:	Good Candidate has adequate work history in arts education. EVIDENCE:
Classroom Management	Poor Candidate has no classroom management experience or plan. EVIDENCE:	Fair Candidate has an understanding of the skills needed to effectively manage a classroom. EVIDENCE	Good Candidate has the necessary skills and knowledge to effectively manage a classroom. EVIDENCE:
Attitude	Poor Candidate exhibited a poor, disengaging attitude. EVIDENCE:	Fair Candidate had some positive energy and was engaging 50% of the time. EVIDENCE:	Good Candidate exhibited positive energy and enthusiasm, and has the knowledge to effectively engage a classroom. EVIDENCE:
Appropriateness of Lesson	Poor Candidate did not use age-appropriate activities during his or her model lesson. EVIDENCE:	Fair Candidate used some age-appropriate activities during his or her model lesson. EVIDENCE:	Good Candidate has a clear understanding of age-appropriate activities. EVIDENCE: