iRubric: Educational Leadership & Supervision Presentation rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Educational Leadership & Supervision Presentation

Rubric for evaluating student presentations. Can be applied to any presentation. Adopted from http://www.ncsu.edu/midlink/rub.pres.html

Rubric Code: KX4466

By mhirsch

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: (General)

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Presentation Rubric
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Content	Excellent Students have extracted & explained many key ideas from the readings.	Good Students have extracted & explained a few key ideas from the readings.	Fair Students do not present sufficient content from the readings.	Poor Students do not present any relevent content to the class.
Organization	Excellent Students present information in logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow. Includes summary and application/ experience.	Good Students present information in logical sequence which audience can follow. Inculdes summary and experience.	Fair Audience has difficulty following presentation because student jumps around. Lacking application of content.	Poor Audience cannot understand presentation because there is no sequence of information.
Eye Contact	Excellent Students maintain eye contact with audience and engage the audience.	Good Students maintain eye contact most of the time and engage the audience most of the time.	Fair Students occasionally use eye contact, but presentation lacks energy and commitment.	Poor Students read all of report with no eye contact. Presentation is devoid of energy and commitment.
Elocution	Excellent Students used a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all audience members can hear presentation. Very Good partnering.	Good Students' voices were clear. Student pronounces most words correctly. Most audience members can hear presentation. Good partnering.	Fair Students' voices were low. Students incorrectly pronounced terms. Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation. Partnering is awkward.	Poor Students mumble, incorrectly pronounces terms, and speak too quietly for students in the class to hear. Partnering is not effective.
Time	Excellent The presentation was at least 20 minutes. Adequate time was allocated to summary and application/ experience.	Good The presentation was at least 15 minutes. Adequate time was allocated to summary and application/ experience.	Fair The presentation was at least 10 minutes. Summary and/or application needed more time.	Poor The presentation was less than 5 minutes. Inadequate time for summary and application.

Keywords:

Presentation

Subjects:

(General)

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric