Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Solo/Duo/Trio rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Solo/Duo/Trio
Trio/Quartet Project
Students had option to choreograph solo, duo or trio.
Rubric Code:
KX3W328
By
lbrindley
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
Dance
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Trio/Quartet
Poor
2 pts
Fair
4 pts
Good
6 pts
Skilled Choreographer
8 pts
Dance Dynamics
Poor
Student had little to no added dynamics. Dancers stayed in the same formation for their entire piece. Barely or no level changes. Movement quality was not clear.
Fair
Student had very little dynamic to their dance. Dancers remained in the same spot for most of the dance, may have changed formation once. Movement quality was not clear.
Good
Student included some dynamics into their dance, but could have added some more elements to their choreography.
Skilled Choreographer
Student included level changes, tempo variations, formation changes, and various pathways in their dance. Movements quality was clear.
Weekly Rehearsal Time
Poor
Student rarely had anything new to teach, and if not prepared, instead of creating new material, they would sit out.
Fair
Student sometimes had something new to teach, but was easily distracted.
Good
Student almost always had something new to teach their dancers, but sometimes would get distracted by conversation.
Skilled Choreographer
Choreographer kept dancers busy, and always had new choreography to teach, or choreography to clean.
In Class Performance
Poor
Students performed with little effort and did not seem to know most of the choreography. Choreographer may or may not have been respectful.
Fair
Students performed with some effort, and knew most of the choreography. Choreographer may or may not have been respectful.
Good
Students performed with full effort. Dancers seemed to know most of the choreographer. Choreographer was respectful towards dancers.
Skilled Choreographer
Students performed dance in class and with full effort. Dancers knew the choreography. Choreographer showed good leadership skills and treated dancers with respect.
Technique/Choreography
Poor
Choreographer did not work well with their ability. Dancer's were not working at full potential, and disregarded technique.
Fair
Choreographer worked okay with their ability. They could have challenged themselves more. Dancers were working at minimal potential forgetting technique.
Good
Choreographer worked well with their ability, but could have challenged have themselves more. Dancers were dancing at full potential with some technique.
Skilled Choreographer
Choreographer challenged themselves, but also worked with their ability. They made sure their dancers were working at their full potential including strong technique.
Using Feedback
Poor
Student did not listen to feedback, nor used it to help finish their project.
Fair
Student listened to feedback, but did not use it to their advantage.
Good
Student listened to feedback and tried to use it to help continue working on their piece.
Skilled Choreographer
Student listened to feedback and used it to their advantage exploring different options and enhancing their dance.
Subjects:
Dance
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Dance rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.