iRubric: Group Project PPT on a Disease Process rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Group Project PPT on a Disease Process

Disease Powerpoint Presentation

Rubric Code: KX34CCX

By tishdorman

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Nursing

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Topic:
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 6 pts	Good 11 pts	Excellent 16 pts
Pathophysiology 15 %	Poor Lacks clear/researched information regarding the pathophysiology and etiology of the chosen disease process..	Fair Provides information regarding the pathophysiology and etiology of the chosen disease process, but needs more research/clarity.	Good Provides clear/researched information of the pathophysiology and etiology of the chosen disease process.	Excellent Provides detailed, clear/researched information of the pathophysiology and etiology of the chosen disease process.
Signs and Symptoms 15 %	Poor Insufficient signs and symptoms provided and did not relate to the pathophysiology.	Fair Major sign and symptoms provided with inaccurate rationale relating to pathophysiology.	Good List of signs and symptoms with rationale relating to pathophysiology, but incomplete.	Excellent Complete list of signs and symptoms with rationale relating to pathophysiology.
Labs / Diagnostics 15 %	Poor Insufficient list of labs and diagnostic tests provided. Inconsistent with providing normal and abnormal results. Did not relate to pathophysiology.	Fair Provides incomplete list of labs and diagnostics tests necessary for this disease process. Inconsistencies with normal and abnormal, abnormal, and expected results relating to pathophysiology.	Good Provided major labs and diagnostics tests necessary for this disease process. Included normal and abnormal, abnormal, and expected results relating to pathophysiology.	Excellent Provides all labs and diagnostics tests necessary for this disease process. Included normal and abnormal, abnormal, and expected results relating to pathophysiology.
Medications 15 %	Poor List of medications provided only.	Fair Incomplete list of medications provided for this disease process. Discrepancies in dosage, route, action, side effects, and contraindications.	Good The majority of medications provided for this disease process with dosage, route, action, side effects, and contraindications.	Excellent A complete list of expected medications for this disease process with dosage, route, action, side effects, and contraindications.
Nursing Assessment 15 %	Poor Incomplete nursing assessment and findings. Did not relate to pathophysiology.	Fair Incomplete nursing assessment with inconsistencies in findings related to pathophysiology.	Good Complete nursing assessment with minor inconsistencies in subjective and objective findings with rationale related to pathophysiology.	Excellent Complete nursing assessment with subjective and objective findings with rationale related to pathophysiology.
Nursing Intervention 15 %	Poor Insufficient nursing interventions and rationale provided.	Fair Inconsistencies in nursing interventions based on nursing assessment findings carried out with insufficient rationale.	Good Majority of nursing interventions prioritized based on nursing assessment findings carried out with rationale.	Excellent Prioritizes nursing interventions based on nursing assessment findings with rationale.
Presentation speaker notes 2.5 %	Poor he layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.	Fair he layout shows structure, but appears cluttered/busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy backgrounds, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.	Good The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.	Excellent The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
Speaker notes 2.5 %	Poor No speaker notes provided.	Fair Speaker notes inconsistent in providing discussion sufficient to understand slide presentation. Inconsistent citations used.	Good Speaker notes mostly provide discussion sufficient to understand slide presentation. Appropriate citations used.	Excellent Speaker notes provide discussion sufficient to understand slide presentation. Appropriate citations used.
References 2.5 % Includes source references and in text citations in APA 6th ed. formatting.	Poor No reference page is included. No citations are used.	Fair Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.	Good Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.	Excellent In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Mechanics of Writing 2.5 % (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	Poor Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.	Fair Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.	Good Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.	Excellent Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Subjects:

Nursing

Types:

Discuss this rubric