iRubric: Assignment #2 Analysis of Skills and Professional Developmen rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Assignment #2 Analysis of Skills and Professional Developmen

In light of the standards for EL Educator Standards found in your Handbook, first analyze your skills, strengths and weaknesses, both as a classroom teacher and as an ENL teacher. Next, based on this analysis, develop your own professional development plan for increasing your knowledge, skills and dispositions based on the outline described in Sakai and on syllabus.

Rubric Code: KX28A79

By ELouise

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: Graduate

Assignment #2 Analysis of Skills/PD In light of the standards for EL Educator Standards found in your Handbook, first analyze your skills, strengths and weaknesses, both as a classroom teacher and as an ENL teacher. Next, based on this analysis, develop your own professional development plan for increasing your knowledge, skills and dispositions based on the outline described in Sakai and on syllabus.
	Incomplete 0 pts	Needs Improvement 5 pts	Almost There! 8 pts	Complete 9 pts	Exceptional 10 pts
Analysis of Skills 20 pts Enter description	Incomplete (0 points) Did not complete this section	Needs Improvement (1-10 points) Two or more of the following are missing: •Skill strengths and weaknesses listed •Evidence supporting mastery •Explanation of challenges or skills that need development •Relationship to “mainstream” teaching and ENL teaching stated	Almost There! (11-16 points) •Skill strengths and weaknesses listed •Evidence supporting mastery •Explanation of challenges or skills that need development One of the following is missing-- •Relationship to “mainstream” teaching and ENL teaching stated	Complete (17-18 points) •Skill strengths and weaknesses listed •Evidence supporting mastery •Explanation of challenges or skills that need development •Relationship to “mainstream” teaching and ENL teaching stated	Exceptional (20 points) •Skill strengths and weaknesses listed in relation to standards •Evidence supporting mastery with clearly defined examples •Explanation of challenges or skills that need development with examples •Relationship to “mainstream” teaching and ENL teaching explained thoroughly
Standards 5 pts Enter description	Incomplete (0 points) Did not complete this section	Needs Improvement (1-2 points) Standard missing and not explained	Almost There! (3 points) Standard missing or not explained	Complete (4 points) 2 or more standards clearly cited	Exceptional (5 points) 2 or more standards clearly cited and explained in relationship to analysis of skills
Goal(s) 10 pts Enter description	Incomplete (0 points) Did not complete this section	Needs Improvement (1-5 points) Goals are missing 2 or more of the following: Goal(s) are missing •explanation OR •link to standards OR •relationship to student learning OR •relationship to professional growth	Almost There! (6-8 points) Goal(s) are missing one of the following: •explanation OR •link to standards OR •relationship to student learning OR •relationship to professional growth	Complete (9 points) Goal(s) are •clearly specified •based on standards •related to student learning •related to professional growth	Exceptional (10 points) Goals are thoroughly explained, clearly linked to standards and analysis of skills and student learning and professional growth
Objectives and Activities 20 pts	Incomplete (0 points) Did not complete this section	Needs Improvement (1-10 points) Missing objectives or activities	Almost There! (11-17 points) Missing some objectives or activities OR not clear	Complete (18-19 points) Objectives clearly stated with identified activities clearly related to goal	Exceptional (20 points) Objectives clearly stated and thoroughly explained with identified activities clearly related to goal(s)
Timeline 10 pts	Incomplete (0 points) Did not complete this section	Needs Improvement (1-7 points) Objectives or activities are demonstrate 2 or more of the following: not clearly stated and/or not related to goal and/or Missing either objectives and/or activities	Almost There! (8-9 points) Objectives or Activities are either not clearly stated or not related to goal or Missing either objectives or activities	Complete (10 points) Realistic, comprehensible timeline for achieving the objectives/goal included	Exceptional (10 points) Realistic, comprehensible timeline for achieving the objectives/goal included
Collaboration and Documentation 20 pts	Incomplete (0 points) Did not complete this section	Needs Improvement (1-10 points) Evidence of collaboration with colleagues not included or incomplete Documentation of activities not included or incomplete	Almost There! (11-17 points) Evidence of collaboration with colleagues incomplete Documentation of activities incomplete	Complete (18-19 points) Evidence of collaboration clearly documented (examples) Completed activities documented (examples)	Exceptional (20 points) Evidence of collaboration clearly documented (examples) Completed activities documented (examples) Examples are easy to identify, and tie in well with goals and objectives
Assessment Plan + SMART Goals 10 pts Specific Measureable Achievable Realistic Timely	Incomplete (0 points) Did not complete this section	Needs Improvement (1-5 points) incomplete assessment plan that is missing indicators of growth and/or or not related to goals objectives, SMART goals are missing or components are missing.	Almost There! (6-8 points) Complete assessment plan that may be missing indicators of growth or indicators are not clear or not related to goals objectives, missing SMART components or not related to student learning	Complete (9 points) Complete assessment plan that includes indicators of growth, SMART Goals some connection to student learning	Exceptional (10 points) Complete assessment plan that includes indicators of growth Indicators of growth are easily interpreted and reflect goals/objectives listed SMART Goals are thoroughly explained, direct connections to student learning
Grammar & Coherence 5 pts	Incomplete (1-2 points) Incomprehensible for the most part	Needs Improvement (3 points) •More than 3 grammar or spelling errors •Lack of structure and sentence variety to convey meaning clearly •Sentence and paragraph structure and language usage is confusing. •Lacks introduction or conclusion •Incomplete or incoherent sentences	Almost There! (4 points) Missing Criteria •More than 3 grammar or spelling errors •Lack of structure and sentence variety to convey meaning clearly •Sentence and paragraph structure and language usage is confusing. •Lacks introduction or conclusion •Incomplete or incoherent sentences	Complete (5 points) •Less than 3 grammar or spelling errors •Skillfully uses sentence variety and precise vocabulary to convey meaning effectively •Sentence, paragraph structure, and language usage clearly conveys ideas (Introduction, Body, Conclusion) •Complete and coherent sentences	Exceptional (5 points) •There are no grammar or spelling errors •Skillfully uses sentence variety and precise vocabulary to convey meaning effectively •Sentence, paragraph structure, and language usage clearly conveys ideas (Introduction, Body, Conclusion) •Complete and coherent sentences Concise, Interesting and Informative

Subjects:

Education

Types:

Assignment

Discuss this rubric