iRubric: Peer Discussion Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Peer Discussion Rubric

Peer Online Discussion Rubric

This rubric will be used to evaluate peer discussions regarding "To All Persons of Japanese Ancestry" document.

Rubric Code: K7B757

By SCzerwinski

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: (none)

Peer Assessment Collaboration Rubri
	Poor=2 points (N/A)	Fair=4 points (N/A)	Good=6 points (N/A)	Excellent=8 points (N/A)
Participation	Poor=2 points Group member did not participate.	Fair=4 points Group member participated but was rarely on task.	Good=6 points Group member participated most of the time and was on task most of the time.	Excellent=8 points Group member participated fully and was always on task.
Leadership	Poor=2 points Group member did not assume leadership or assumed it in a nonproductive manner.	Fair=4 points Group member usually allowed others to assumed leadership or often dominated the group.	Good=6 points Group member sometimes assumed leadership in an appropriate way.	Excellent=8 points Group member assumed leadership in an appropriate way when necessary by helping the group stay on track, encouraging group participation, and having a positive attitude.
Responding	Poor=2 points Group member did not respond to others' ideas.	Fair=4 points Group member sometimes responded to others' ideas.	Good=6 points Group member usually responded to others' ideas.	Excellent=8 points Group member responded carefully to others' ideas.
Feedback	Poor=2 points Group member did not offer constructive or useful feedback.	Fair=4 points Group member occasionally offered contructive feedback, but sometime the comment were not useful.	Good=6 points Group member offered consturcitve feedback when appropriate.	Excellent=8 points Group member offered detailed, constructive feedback when appropriate.
Cooperation	Poor=2 points Group member often treated others disrespectfully or did not share the workload fairly.	Fair=4 points Group member sometimes treated others disrespectfully or did not share the workload fairly.	Good=6 points Group member usually treated others respectfully and shared the workload fairly.	Excellent=8 points Group member treated others resptectfully and shared the workload fairly.