Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Psychology Team Presentation rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Psychology Team Presentation
Team Presentation
Rubric Code:
K7B559
By
mypekkle
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Business
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
NonVerbal Skills
Excellent
6 pts
Very Good
5 pts
Good
4 pts
Fair
3 pts
Needs Improvement
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Eye Contact
Excellent
All team members held the attention of entire audience with the use of direct eye contact, seldom looking at notes or visual aids.
Very Good
Most team members held the attention of entire audience with the use of direct eye contact, seldom looking at notes or visual aids.
Good
Most team members had consistent use of direct eye contact with audience, but still returns to notes or reads from visual aids.
Fair
Most team members displayed minimal eye contact with audience, while reading mostly from the notes or from reads from visual aids.
Needs Improvement
All team members displayed minimal eye contact with audience, while reading mostly from the notes or from reads from visual aids.
Poor
None of the team members made eye contact with audience, as entire presentation is read from notes and/or visual aids.
Body Language
Excellent
All team members had movements which seem fluid and help the audience visualize.
Very Good
Most team members had movements which seem fluid and help the audience visualize.
Good
Most team members made movements or gestures that enhances articulation.
Fair
Most team members had very little movement or descriptive gestures.
Needs Improvement
All team members had very little movement or descriptive gestures.
Poor
No movement or descriptive gestures were displayed by any of the team members.
Poise
Excellent
All team members displayed relaxed, sself-confident nature about self, with no mistakes.
Very Good
Most team members displayed relaxed, sself-confident nature about self, with no mistakes.
Good
Most team members make minor mistakes but quickly recovers from them; Most team members display little or no tension.
Fair
Most team members displyed mild tension; some members had trouble recovering from mistakes.
Needs Improvement
All team members displyed mild tension and had trouble recovering from mistakes.
Poor
All team members showed obvious tension and nervousness and had trouble recovering from mistakes.
Verbal Skills
Excellent
6 pts
Very Good
5 pts
Good
4 pts
Fair
3 pts
Needs Improvement
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Enthusiasm
Excellent
All team members demonstrated a strong positive feeling about topic during entire presentation.
Very Good
Most team members demonstrated a strong positive feeling about topic during entire presentation.
Good
All team members occasionally showed positive feelings about the topic.
Fair
Most team members occasionally showed positive feelings about the topic.
Needs Improvement
Some team members showed some negativity toward topic presented.
Poor
All team members absolutely showed no interest in topic presented.
Delivery
Excellent
All team members used a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all audience members can hear the presentation.
Very Good
Most team members used a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all audience members can hear the presentation.
Good
Most team members' voice is clear. Most team members pronouced most words correctly. Most audience members can hear the presentation.
Fair
Some team members' voice is low and some team members pronounced terms incorrctly. Audience members have difficulty hearing the presentation.
Needs Improvement
All team members' voice is low and all team members pronounced terms incorrctly. Audience members have difficulty hearing the presentation.
Poor
All team members mumbled during the presentation, incorrectly pronounced terms, and spoke too quietly for majority of the audience to hear.
Content
Excellent
6 pts
Very Good
5 pts
Good
4 pts
Fair
3 pts
Needs Improvement
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Subject Knowledge
Excellent
All team members demostrated full knowledge by answering all class questions with explanations and elaboration.
Very Good
Most team members demostrated full knowledge by answering all class questions with explanations and elaboration.
Good
Most team members is at ease with expected answers to all questions, without elabortion.
Fair
Some team members seemed uncomfortable with information and is able to answer only rudimentary questions.
Needs Improvement
All team members seemed uncomfortable with information and is able to answer only rudimentary questions.
Poor
All team members do not have grasp of the information; team members are unable to answer questions about the subject presented.
Organization
Excellent
All the information was presented in a logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow.
Very Good
Most of the information presented was in a logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow.
Good
Most of the information was presented in a logical sequence which the audience can follow.
Fair
Audience had some difficulty following the presentation because team members jumped around a little during the presentation.
Needs Improvement
Audience had difficulty following the presentation becauase the team members jumped around a lot during the presentation.
Poor
Audience cannot understand presentation because their is no sequence of information.
Mechanics/Visual Aid
Excellent
Presentation had no misspellings or grammatical errors.
Very Good
Presentation had no more than 2 misspellings and/or grammatical errors.
Good
Presentation had no more than 3 misspellings and/or grammatical errors.
Fair
Presentation had no more than 4 misspellings and/or grammatical errors.
Needs Improvement
Presentation had no more than 5 misspellings and/or grammatical errors.
Poor
Presentation had 5 or more misspellings and/or grammatical errors.
Creativity
Excellent
Presentation was extremely creative, well thought out, and very interesting. Team did an excellent job.
Very Good
Presentation was very creative and very interesting. Team did a very good job.
Good
Presentation was creative and interesting. Team did a good job.
Fair
Presentation was somewhat creative and somewhat interesting. Team did a fair job.
Needs Improvement
Presentation was not very creative, but somewhat interesting. Team needs improvement in this area.
Poor
Presentation was not creative, nor interesting. Team did poor.
Participation
Contribution by Each Team Member
Excellent
Superb team players. All team members go out of their way to help the rest of the team in any way they can to address audience questions, get over glitches during their presentations, etc., but doing all this as unobtrusively as possible
Very Good
Very good team players. Most team players are interested in the presentations by the other team members; team members make a definite effort to ensure the success of the overall team presentation by frequently helping the rest of the team respond to audience questions.
Good
Good team players. Some team members showed interest in the presentations by the other team members; some team mambers make an effort to ensure the success of the overall team presentation by occasionally helping the rest of the team respond to audience questions.
Fair
Team members mainly focused on his/her portion of the presentation; responds when another team member asks him/her a direct question but otherwise does not attempt to help other team members address audience questions.
Needs Improvement
Some team members seemed to have no interest in the presentations by the other members of the team; occasionally gets into arguments with the other members.
Poor
All team members seemed to have no interest in the presentations by the other members of the team; continous conflict and rguments occus with the other members.
Subjects:
Business
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Business rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.