Skip to main content
iRubric: Presentation Project-based Rubric

iRubric: Presentation Project-based Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Presentation Project-based Rubric 
Presentation Project-based Rubric
Rubric for evaluating student presentations. Can be applied to any presentation. Adopted from http://www.ncsu.edu/midlink/rub.pres.html
Rubric Code: K2466BC
By adnansauddin
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Presentation Rubric
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Clear and Accurate Information

Poor

Attempts to address prompt, but lacks focus or is off task.
Fair

Addresses prompt accurately, but with a weak or uneven focus.
Good

Addresses all aspects of prompt appropriately and maintains a clear steady focus.
Excellent

Addresses all aspects of prompt appropriately and maintains a strongly developed focus.
Main Subject Objective

Poor

Attempts to establish a controlling idea, but lacks a clear purpose.
Fair

Establishes a controlling idea with a general purpose
Good

Establishes a controlling idea with a clear purpose maintained throughout the presentation.
Excellent

Establishes a strong controlling idea with a clear purpose maintained throughout the presentation.
Materials needed to reflect accurate research

Poor

Student attempts to use material to execute project, but lacks connections or relevance to the project, with many missing elements in completing presentation.
Fair

Presents materials relevant to the purpose of the project/presentation. Begins to address the credibility of material when prompted.
Good

Presents materials relevant to the purpose of the project/presentation with accuracy and sufficient detail. Addresses credibility of sources when prompted.
Excellent

Presents materials relevant to the purpose of the project/presentation with effective selection of detail. Addresses credibility of sources and identifies sources unprompted.
Mechanics of Project (make sense)

Poor

Attempts to provide details, but lacks sufficient development and relevancy. Missing information to connect presentation.
Fair

Presents appropriate details to support the focus and controlling idea, yet briefly notes a relevant gap/ unanswered questions about presentation.
Good

Presents appropriate and sufficient details to support the focus and controlling idea, explains relevant and plausible notes with a relevant gap/ unanswered questions about presentation.
Excellent

Presents thorough and detailed information to strongly support the focus and controlling idea, discusses relevant information with no unanswered questions about presentation.
Organization

Poor

Attempts to organize ideas, but lacks control of structure
Fair

Presents appropriate organizational structure to address the specific requirements of the presentation, with lapses in coherence or awkward use of organizational structure.
Good

Maintains an appropriate organizational structure to address the specific requirements of the presentation.
Excellent

Maintains an organizational structure that intentionally and effectively enhances presentation of information required by the specific presentation to address the specific requirements of the prompt.
Proper Terminology

Poor

Attempts to demonstrate English conventions, but lacks cohesion and control of grammar, usage, and mechanics.
Fair

Demonstrated the uneven command of the English conventions, Uses language and tone with some inaccurate, or inconsistencies.
Good

Demonstrated a command of the English conventions, with few errors. Uses language and tone appropriately with minor errors.
Excellent

Demonstrated and maintains a well-developed command of the English conventions, with few errors. Uses language and tone appropriate to the audience, purpose, and specific requirements of the prompt.
Overall- did it work?

Poor

Attempts to include content, explanations, but understanding of content was weak, content is irrelevant, inappropriate or inaccurate.
Fair

Briefly notes content relevant, shows basic or uneven understanding of content, minor errors in explanation.
Good

Accurately presents content relevant, shows basic or uneven understanding of content, with sufficient explanations that demonstrate understanding.
Excellent

Integrates relevant and accurate content with thorough explanations that demonstrate understanding in-depth.



Keywords:
  • Presentation

Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16