Skip to main content
iRubric: Capstone Comprehensive: Scoring Extended Responses rubric

iRubric: Capstone Comprehensive: Scoring Extended Responses rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Capstone Comprehensive: Scoring Extended Responses 
This rubric can be used to score extended response questions. For each criterion (Understanding, Reasoning and Communication,) it is not expected that every indicator will apply for every question.
Rubric Code: K234B9
By rdiones
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Exam  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate, Post Graduate

Powered by iRubric Extended Response Scoring
Extended response answers can be scored. This is a general, analytic rubric.
  Exemplary

(N/A)

Satisfactory

(N/A)

Minimal

(N/A)

Unsatisfactory

(N/A)

Understanding

The student is able to demonstrate accurate content knowledge and understanding.
Exemplary

The student shows exemplary understanding of the presented issue(s) by expansively and correctly (1) addressing the critical content, (2)identifying and fully addressing the key concepts or main ideas, (3) substantiating points with several accurate examples or (4) extensively and correctly using terminology.
Satisfactory

The student shows understanding of the presented issue(s) by correctly (1) addressing the most critical content, (2) identifying and addressing some of the key concepts or main ideas, (3) substantiating some points with accurate examples, or (4)
using some correct terminology.
Minimal

The student shows marginal or poor understanding of the presented issue(s) by (1) barely touching on the relevant content, (2) poorly or incorrectly identifying and addressing a key concept or main idea, (3) not substantiating points with relevant or accurate examples, or (4) minimal use of terminology or use of terminology with errors .
Unsatisfactory

The student shows no understanding of the presented issue(s) by (1) not addressing or incorrectly addressing the relevant content, (2) not identifying or incorrectly addressing a key concept or main idea, (3) providing no or inaccurate, unsubstantiated examples or (4) incorrectly or not using relevant terminology.
Reasoning

The student is able to reason with the given task situation.
Exemplary

The student expertly:
(1) synthesizes material, (2) makes several connections between relevant topics, (3) optimally solves the problem with rationale(s), (4) chooses, creates and uses integrative diagrams or charts, (5) presents an insightful and thorough evaluation of a situation or(6) integrates content specific knowledge (e.g. math) with pedagogical principles.
Satisfactory

The student can:
(1) synthesize material, (2) make some connections between topics, (3) provide a solution to the problem, (4) choose and use relevant diagrams or charts, (5) present a correct evaluation of a situation or (6) address the relationship between content specific knowledge (e.g. math) with pedagogical principles.
Minimal

Although making an attempt, the student:
(1) poorly synthesizes material, (2) makes weak connections to other topics, (3) presents a weak solution to the problem, (4) does not use relevant diagrams or charts, (5) presents an incorrect evaluation of a situation or (6) does not address the relationship between content specific knowledge (e.g. math) and pedagogical principles.
Unsatisfactory

The student does not reason with the assigned materials or solve the given problem.
Communication

The student communicates with the reader.
Exemplary

(1) Writing is clearly presented, well-sequenced, and logically presented, (2) content is easy to understand and points are easy to follow or (3) there are few or no errors in spelling or mechanics to interfere with the reader’s ability to comprehend the response.
Satisfactory

(1) Writing is mostly clear, well-sequenced, and logically presented, (2) content is understandable, or (3) there are some errors in spelling or mechanics.
Minimal

(1) Writing is fragmented, poorly sequenced, or lacking in clarity or logic, (2) much is left unexplained and left to the reader to infer intended meaning, or (3) problems with spelling or mechanics may contribute to an overall difficulty for the reader to comprehend the response.
Unsatisfactory

There is no response or it is incomprehensible.



Keywords:
  • Education, New Teachers

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16