Skip to main content
iRubric: Risk Management Group Project rubric

iRubric: Risk Management Group Project rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Risk Management Group Project 
Students analyze a specific incident and simulate an apology and disclosure meeting with a patient/family.
Rubric Code: JX39553
By journalquest
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Health  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Risk Management Group Project
Points for providing a realistic patient/family meeting simulation and written summary as a group
  Excellent

5 pts

Good

4 pts

Fair

3 pts

Poor

2 pts

No attempt

(N/A)

Realistic Meeting Simulation
40 %

Enter description
Excellent

Well prepared, clear roles, realistic presentation. Exercise taken seriously. Evidence that situation has been viewed from multiple perspectives. Honest, sincere approach.
Good

Well prepared, clear roles, realistic presentation. Any exception to taking exercise seriously does not detract from meeting.
Evidence that situation has been seen from more than one perspective. Largely honest and sincere approach with minor avoidance of facts/issues.
Fair

Somewhat prepared, somewhat unclear roles, not completely realistic presentation. Exercise not taken seriously.
No evidence that situation has been seen from more than one perspective. Significant avoidance of facts. Insensitivity.
Poor

Inadequate preparation. Fuzzy roles. Unrealistic. Exercise not taken seriously. Single perspective shown.
No attempt

No attempt
Teamwork
25 %

Enter description
Excellent

Equal contributions to work involved. Leader chosen by consensus. Constructive approach to conflict. No overly dominant team members.
Basic courtesy.
Good

Contributions to work involved by all. Those wishing to lead comply with group preferences. Minor non-constructive approaches to conflict do not impact outcome. No overly dominant or overlooked team members. Basic courtesy.
Fair

Large imbalance in contribution of team members. Leader self appointed. Time wasted or outcome impacted by non-constructive approach to conflict. Overly dominant team members. One or more team members ignored. Lack of courtesy.
Poor

Project lead by one or two dominant team members. Leader does not invite participation. Time wasted and outcome impacted by non-constructive approach. Unable to reach consensus.
No attempt

No attempt
Submission content
25 %

Enter description
Excellent

Well prepared. Situation is discussed clearly and in an organized manner. All key facts included. Significant links to text concepts included.
Good

Adequately prepared. Situation is discussed clearly and in an organized manner. Minor fact missing. Some links to text concepts included.
Fair

Minimal preparation. Situation is presented in a confusing manner. Several minor facts missing. Minimal link to text concepts.
Poor

Little or no preparation. Situation is presented in a disjointed fashion. Key major facts missing. No link to text concepts.
No attempt

No attempt
Submission Org/Structure
5 %

Excellent

-Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions are logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper.
-Reads as though there is one writer.
- Conclusion is logical and flows from the body of the paper.
Good

Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions are present.
-Minor indication that there is more than one writer.
- Conclusion is logical.
Fair

- Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.
- Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
-Obvious that there is more than one writer.
-Lack of or illogical conclusion.
Poor

- Structure of the paper is not easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions need improvement.
-Obvious that there is more than one writer with differing perspective.
- Conclusion is missing, or if provided, does not flow from the body of the paper.
No attempt

No attempt
Submission Grammar and Punctuation
5 %

Excellent

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure
Good

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed with minor errors that do not detract from the readability of the work.
-Spelling is correct.
Fair

- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
Poor

- Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.
No attempt

No attempt




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16