iRubric: Contemporary Artist Presentation and Emulation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Contemporary Artist Presentation and Emulation

Contemporary Artists, 1960 - Today

Rubric Code: JA5326

By lhohlwein

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Arts and Design

Type: Project

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Contemporary Artist Emulation
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Presentation Quality	Poor Information in the presentation was largely plagiarized, taken from the internet without citation or understanding of the content. The student showed very little enthusiasm for the artist or his/her work. Presentation was mumbly or unclear.	Fair Information in the presentation showed minimal understanding of the content. The student showed moderate enthusiasm for the artist or his/her work. Presentation was satisfactory. Sources were not cited.	Good Information in the presentation was clear, processed and cited. The student showed enthusiasm for the artist or his/her work. Presentation was engaging. Sources were cited.	Excellent Information in the presentation was clear, processed and cited. The student showed strong enthusiasm for the artist or his/her work. Sources were cited. Presentation was very engaging. Listeners were 'sold' on the value and contribution of this artist and the student's emulation conveyed this value.
Creativity in Emulation	Poor Little to no effort taken to recreate the style, the materials or the approach of the artist, no personal touch in work, no personal touch or inspiration shown in work.	Fair Adequate recreation of the materials or the approach of the artist, too close of a reproduction of existing piece, little inspiration shown. Essentially a copy of what already exists.	Good Very emulation of the materials or the approach of the artist, some evidence of personality in creation, general reproduction of existing artwork, evidence of inspirartion shown.	Excellent Excellent emulation of the materials or the approach of the artist, student put his/her special touch into piece, not exact reproduction, clearly inspired by his/her chosen artist.
Knowledge	Poor Student knows nothing about how or why their artist chose to work the way they did. Unable to discuss the artist's life, and unable to state why they chose their particular artist.	Fair Student knows little about the reasons his/her artist worked the way he/she did, can discuss a few aspects of the artist's life, work and/or inspiration, and can name one or two reasons why they chose that particular artist.	Good Student is able to defend why his/her artist chose to work in a certain way, is able to discuss some aspects of their artist's life, work and inspiration, and can name a few reasons why they chose their particular artist.	Excellent Student is able to defend why his/her chosen artist chose to work in a certain way, is comfortably able to talk about many different aspects of their chosen artist's life, work, and inspiration, and is able to explain in concise terms why they chose their particular artist
Product	Poor Shows virtually no knowledge of artist. Poorly crafted. Material use and selection is inappropriate. Many improvements could be made on final product. No plans made beforehand.	Fair Shows little evidence of knowledge of artist. Adequately crafted. Materials haphazardly used and/or selected. Improvements could be made in the emulation and presentation. Shows little commitment of time or effort.	Good Shows evidence of knowledge of artist. Neat, clean, and well-crafted. Materials used and selected well. A few improvements could be made in finished piece. Student considered content and meaning and gave the project time.	Excellent Care was obviously taken in creation of product. Shows evidence of thorough knowledge of artist. Neat, clean, and well-crafted. materials selected and used conscientiously. Work showed a commitment of time and effort.
Timeliness	Poor Student was behaving inappropriately, was late and was not on task. Work was unfinished. No evidence of effort or involvement.	Fair Project was submitted on time but only one-half was completed.	Good Project was submitted on time and all parts of the assignment were addressed.	Excellent Student worked neatly, used materials safely and appropriately. Student was on time and on task. All parts of the assignment were completed.

Subjects:

Arts and Design

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric