iRubric: Wren Student Council Applications rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Wren Student Council Applications

2013-2014 Membership

Rubric Code: J984WX

By WrenStuco

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: (General)

Type: (Other)

Grade Levels: 9-12

Stuco Applications
	Excellent You should become a member of Student Council 4 pts	Good You could be a member of Student Council but it is not certain 3 pts	Fair You show some of the skill required to be a member of Student Council 2 pts	Poor You skills are not up to Student Council Expectations 1 pts
First Impressions	Excellent It is obvious that the Candidate has put time and thought into his or her answers.	Good The candidate has put some time and thought into his or her answers.	Fair It seems as though the candidate has put close to no time or thought into his or her answers.	Poor The candidate has put no time and thought into his or her answers.
Preparation	Excellent Candidate was definitely prepared to answer the questions.	Good Candidate seemed mostly prepared to answer the questions.	Fair Candidate seemed barely prepared to answer the questions.	Poor Candidate was not prepared to answer the questions.
General Attitudes	Excellent Candidate is energetic and is genuinely interested in the position.	Good Candidate is passive and seems interested or is overly enthusiastic of the position.	Fair Candidate is neutral and shows little enthusiasm in the position.	Poor Candidate is dull and shows a lack of interest in the position.
Response	Excellent The candidate is very knowledgeable in the responsibilities of a Student Council member. He or she demonstrates full knowledge by answering all questions with explanations and elaboration	Good The candidate is somewhat knowledgeable in the responsibilities of a Student Council member. He or she demonstrates little knowledge by answering the questions with some explanations.	Fair The candidate has little knowledge in the responsibilities of a Student Council member. He or she does not provide explanations.	Poor Candidate seems to have no knowledge in the responsibilities of a Student Council member.
Quality	Excellent Candidate's answers reflect outstanding professional depth and quality. Candidate will be a strong voice and leader for his or her class.	Good Candidate's answers reflect adequate professional depth and quality. Candidate will most likely be a strong voice and leader for his or her class.	Fair Candidate's answers reflect average depth and quality. Candidate will not likely be a strong voice and leader for his or her class.	Poor Candidate's answers did not reflect depth or quality. Candidate will not be a strong voice or leader for his or her class.
Overall	Excellent Candidate would be an essential component to Student Council.	Good Candidate would make a good student council member.	Fair Candidate would be a fair student council member.	Poor Candidate would be detrimental to the effectiveness of Student Council.

Subjects:

(General)

Types:

(Other)

Discuss this rubric