iRubric: Oral Communication VALUE Rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Oral Communication VALUE Rubric

Oral communication is a prepared, purposeful presentation designed to increase knowledge, to foster understanding, or to promote change in the listeners' attitudes, values, beliefs, or behaviors. Oral communication takes many forms. This rubric is specifically designed to evaluate oral presentations of a single speaker at a time and is best applied to live or video-recorded presentations. For panel presentations or group presentations, it is recommended that each speaker be evaluated separately. This rubric best applies to presentations of sufficient length such that a central message is conveyed, supported by one or more forms of supporting materials and includes a purposeful organization. An oral answer to a single question not designed to be structured into a presentation does not readily apply to this rubric. Courtesy of AAC&U: http://aacu.org/value/index.cfm

Rubric Code: J72CXC

By B_white36

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: (General)

Type: (Other)

Grade Levels: K-5

Oral Presentation Rubric B
	Great 6 pts	Good 5 pts	Ok 4 pts	Below average 1 pts
Organization	Great -Specific introduction and conclusion -Sequenced material within the body -Cohesive presentation content	Good -Specific introduction and conclusion -Sequenced material within the body -Cohesive presentation content	Ok -Specific introduction and conclusion -Sequenced material within the body is inconsistent	Below average -Specific introduction and conclusion -No sequence in material
Language	Great -Educated and imaginative -Enhance the effectiveness of the presentation -Correct grammar -Appropriate to audience	Good -Thoughtful -Support the effectiveness of the presentation -Correct grammar -Appropriate to audience	Ok -Not interesting -Partially support the effectiveness of the presentation -Correct grammar -Appropriate to audience	Below average -Unclear -Minimally support the effectiveness of the presentation -Occasional mistakes in grammar -Appropriate to audience
Delivery	Great -Good posture -Eye contact with the audience most of the time -Appropriate gesture and expression -Deliverance with confidence	Good -Good posture -Frequent eye contact with the audience -Appropriate gesture and expression	Ok -Intermitten good posture -Occasional eye contact with the audience -Appropriate gesture and expression -Recurrent fidgets	Below average -Poor posture -Seldom eye contact with the audience -Not enough or too much gesture and expression -Constant fidgets
Content	Great -Topic clearly identified -In-depth explanations of required information -Appropriate reference to information -Presenter's credibility/ authority on the topic clearly established	Good -Topic clearly identified -Moderate-level explanations of required information -Appropriate reference to information -Presenter's credibility/ authority on the topic reasonably established	Ok -Topic clearly identified -Explanations of required information -Appropriate reference to information -Presenter's credibility/ authority on the topic established	Below average -Topic not clearly identified -Limited explanations of required information -Presenter's credibility/ authority on the topic not established
Big Idea	Great Big idea is precisely stated, appropriately repeated, memorable, and strongly supported.	Good Big idea is clear and consistent with the supporting material.	Ok Big idea is understandable but is not often repeated and is not memorable.	Below average Big idea is not clear or explicitly stated in the presentation.
Works Cited This category will apply in case a presentation is supported by written materials.	Great -All sources properly cited in both paper and Works Cited page -No errors in citation format	Good -All sources properly cited in both paper and Works Cited page -Some errors in citation format	Ok -All sources properly cited in both paper and Works Cited page -No errors in citation format	Below average -All sources properly cited in Works Cited page but not in paper -No Works Cited page -Errors in citation format

Keywords:

Oral communication, Central message, Delivery techniques, Supporting material, Language

Subjects:

(General)

Types:

(Other)

Discuss this rubric