iRubric: Portland Fieldwork rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Portland Fieldwork

U2 Geog major field work project on the CBD of Portland including changes over the past 10 years to CBD and Portland's overall population.

Rubric Code: J65924

By evieo8

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Geography

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: 9-12

SAC 5 Portland Fieldwork
	High Distrinction (N/A)	Distinction (N/A)	Credit (N/A)	Pass (N/A)	Low Pass (N/A)	Not Shown (N/A)
Region Defined (2)	High Distrinction 2 Definition includes name of location, area of town, district, state, why region chosen. <BR> Map is clear and includes all BOLTSS	Distinction 1.5 Definition includes name of location, area of town, district, state, why region chosen.<BR> <BR> Map missing 1 BOLTSS	Credit 1.5 Definition includes name town, district and state. Reason why chosen not included. <BR> Map with 2 BOLTSS missing	Pass 1 Definition includes name, town, state only. <BR> <BR> Map with 3 BOLTSS missing	Low Pass 0.5 Definition includes name of area and town only. Map missing 4 or ore BOLTSS	Not Shown 0
Region described 2014 (3)	High Distrinction 3 Description provides excellent detail including size, location, proximity to other features eg beach, ports, facilities; mix of land uses, number of buildings, different "zones" eg hospital/medical to north, restraunt strip on sea front	Distinction 2.5 Description provides very good detail detail including 5 of the following points size, location, proximity to other features eg beach, ports, facilities; mix of land uses, number of buildings, different "zones" eg hospital/medical to north, restraunt strip on sea front	Credit 2 Description provides good detail including 4 of the following - size, location, proximity to other features eg beach, ports, facilities; mix of land uses, number of buildings, different "zones" eg hospital/medical to north, restraunt strip on sea front	Pass 1.5 Description provides basic details including only 3 of : size, location , proximity to other features eg beach, ports, facilities; mix of land uses, number of buildings, different "zones" eg hospital/medical to north, restraunt strip on sea front	Low Pass 1.5 Description provides insufficient detail including only 2 major characteritics	Not Shown 0
Changes in region mapped (4)	High Distrinction 4 Map in neat and well prepared. Map includes all BOLTSS. Concisely annotates at least 6 major changes. Changes shown are varied and accurate.	Distinction 3.5 Map in neat and well prepared. Map includes 5 BOLTSS. Concisely annotates at least 5 major changes. Changes shown are varied and accurate.	Credit 3 Map in neat and well prepared. Map includes 4 BOLTSS. Concisely annotates at least 4 major changes. More variety required in changes shown	Pass 2 Improvements in map neatness and accuracy required. Map includes 3 BOLTSS. Concisely annotates at least 3 major changes. More variety required in changes shown. Some inaccuracies may be present	Low Pass 1.5 Map in rudimentary and includes 2 or less BOLTSS. Annotations lack detail or are just labels. Few changes shown.	Not Shown 0
Retail/comm building changes (3)	High Distrinction 3 Excellent written summary of the changes in commercial and retail buildings. Summary includes changes from commercial to residential l (eg Bond store, London, Coastal Real Estate units increase and changes in retail (eg ALDI, ) increase in commercial (eg Coastal Real Estate), Excellent examples. Photos included to illustrate changes	Distinction 2.5 Very good written summary of the changes in commercial and retail buildings. Summary includes 3 out of 4 changes/ increase in residential ( eg Bond store, London, Coastal Real Estate units increase and changes in retail (eg ALDI, ) increase in commercial (eg coastal Realestate), changes to medical in north. Good examples/ few photos	Credit 2 Good written summary of the changes in commercial and retail buildings. Summary includes 2 out of 4 areas - changes/ increase in residential ( eg Bond store, London, Coastal Real Estate units increase and changes in retail (eg ALDI, ) increase in commercial (eg coastal Realestate), changes to medical in north. Few examples, no photos	Pass 1.5 Basic written summary of the changes in commercial and retail buildings provided. Summary needs to provide more detail, variety and specific examples	Low Pass 1 Summary of the changes in commercial and retail buildings requires substantially more detail. No examples provided.	Not Shown 0
Other landuses changes (3)	High Distrinction 3 Excellent summary of other changes that may have occurred eg changes to residential, increase medical, changes to traffic conditions (median strip/roundabouts, vacant land now built on and one other change. Photos included	Distinction 2.5 Very good summary of other changes that may have occurred 4 out of 5: changes to residential, increase medical, changes to traffic conditions (median strip/roundabouts, vacant land now built on. Photos included	Credit 2 Good summary of other changes that may have occurred 3 out of 5: changes to residential, increase medical, changes to traffic conditions (median strip/roundabouts, vacant land now built on.	Pass 1.5 Basic summary including 2 changes. No photos	Low Pass 1 one change discussed	Not Shown 0
Pop characteristics 2000/14 (5)	High Distrinction 5 Excellent description includes total, female and male, age distribution of both years. Information from two different areas (south and central) has been combined in numbers and graphs and discussed in areas and in combination <BR> graphs and tables are well prepared and information. All tables and graphs are referred to in the text.	Distinction 4 Very good description includes total, female and male, age distribution of both years. Information from two different areas (south and central) is not combines in numbers but discussed individually and combined. Graphs and tables included but not well referred to in text	Credit 3.5 Good description includes total, female and male, age distribution of both years. Information from two different areas (south and central) is not combined in numbers or discussed in combination. Graphs or tables included but not well referred to in text	Pass 3 Basic description includes 2 out of 3: total, female and male, age distribution for both years and areas. Graphs or tables included but not referred to.	Low Pass 2 Description includes 1 out of 3: total, female and male, age distribution. Only one areas shown and discussed. Graphs or tables included but not referred to.	Not Shown 0
Pop differences 2000/14 (5)	High Distrinction 5 Excellent description detailing the difference in population for both areas and in combination: includes differences in size, age, female and male. Graphs and tables demonstrate differences, and are well prepared and referred to in the text. reasons for these difference are explored.	Distinction 4 Very good description detailing the difference in population includes differences in size, age, female and male. Graphs and tables included however they do not demonstrate differences well, and are not referred to in the text in a meaningful way.	Credit 3.5 Good description detailing the difference in population includeing 2 of size, age, female and male. Graphs or tables included however they do not demonstrate differences well, and are not referred to in the text in a meaningful way.	Pass 3 Basic description includes 1 out of 3: total, female and male, age. Graphs or tables included but not referred to.	Low Pass 2 Description includes 1 out of 3: total, female and male, age distribution. no graphs or tables included or referred to for this section	Not Shown 0
4 major changes (4)	High Distrinction 4 - 4 major changes described in excellent detail. Major changes annotated on map. Photos included for all Reasons given are detailed, accurate and insightful. Extra sources of information have been used to add depth to reasons	Distinction 3.5 - 4 major changes described in very good detail. Some major changes annotated on map. Photos included for 3 Reasons given are detailed, accurate. No extra info sourced	Credit 3 - 4 major changes described in good detail. Most major changes not annotated Photos included for 2 Reasons given are detailed and accurate. No extra info sourced	Pass 2 - A basic description of 4 major changes given. Most major changes not annotated.Photos included for 2 -1 Reasons are not explored fully and poorly referenced to the data/sources	Low Pass 1.5 changes discussed briefly	Not Shown 0
Effects of changes (4)	High Distrinction 4 Excellent exploration of positive and negative effects of each change. Discussion includes multiple natural and human impacts. Personal opinions vs opinions expressed in interviews are identified. Extra sources of information have been used to add depth to reasons	Distinction 3.5 Excellent exploration of positive and negative effects of each change. Discussion includes 2 natural and human impacts. "Who's opinion" not identified. No extra information used	Credit 3 Good exploration of positive and negative effects of each change. Discussion includes one natural and human impact.	Pass 2 A basic description has been given covering in most cases only one impact ( neg or pos) and on one sector ( nat or hum)	Low Pass 1.5 A basic description has been given covering 3 - 1 of the changes	Not Shown 0
Spatial assoc changes pop/CBD (4)	High Distrinction 4 Excellent description of the spatial assoc given using correct language. In depth discussion provided exploring more than one possible reasons for the this level of assoc. Extra sources of information have been used to add depth to reasons. Limitations in data explored	Distinction 3.5 Very good description of the spatial assoc given. Expression could be improved. Discussion explores more than one possible reasons for the this level of assoc. No extra info sources used	Credit 3 Good description of the spatail assoc given. Expression could be improved. Discussion explores only one possible reasons for the this level of assoc. No extra info sources	Pass 2 Basic description of the spatail assoc given. Discussion shows a basic understanding of reasons for this assoc.	Low Pass 1.5 Description given but reasons not explored.	Not Shown 0
1 building change (4)	High Distrinction 4 The characteritics and location of the building are described in detail. Photos of multiple uses included. Uses of the building explored fully. Reasons for changes well researched and described. Extra sources used. Good use of SPOC concept in discussion.	Distinction 3.5 The characteritics and location of the building are described. Some photos included. Uses of the building well described. Reasons for changes described - however more research and details could have been used. Attempt to use of SPOC concept in discussion.	Credit 3 The characteritics and location of the building are described in general - not detail. Some photos included. Uses of the building described briefly. Reasons for changes described - however more research and details could have been used. No attempt to use of SPOC concept in discussion.	Pass 2 Location of the building is describe. No discussion of characteristics. Some photos. Uses described briefly.No attempt to use of SPOC concept in discussion.	Low Pass 1.5 Location and characteristics not defined. Some photos. Uses discussed briefly.	Not Shown 0
Spatial concepts & data methods (5)	High Distrinction 5 Excellent use of the concepts of region, location, spatial assoc, distribution, SPOC, scale and movement. All graphs, photos, maps and diagrams labelled correctly ( BOLTSS, titles, SALTNAS), referred to in text. Extra effort has been made to use data outside of shared drive and to present it in different formats.	Distinction 4 Very good use of Spatial concepts 6 - 7 used : region, location, spatial assoc, distribution, SPOC, scale and movement. All graphs, photos, maps and diagrams labelled correctly, and referred to in text.	Credit 3.5 Good use of Spatial concepts 4/5 - 7 used : region, location, spatial assoc, distribution, SPOC, scale and movement. Most graphs, photos, maps and diagrams labelled correctly, and referred to in text.	Pass 3 Basic use of spatial concepts 4/3 - 7 used : region, location, spatial assoc, distribution, SPOC, scale and movement. Most graphs, photos, maps and diagrams not labelled correctly, or referred to in text.	Low Pass 2 - 2 or less concepts used. Most maps, graphs etc not prepared using correct conventions	Not Shown 0
bibliography (3)	High Distrinction 3 All references listed in full including interview participants, population websites, photos, and written sources. An attempt has been made to use a variety of references and to source information from sources other than those on the shared drive	Distinction 2.5 All references listed in full including interview participants, population websites, photos, and written sources.	Credit 2 Most references included. One category missing ( eg photos)<BR> Full reference names/ websites are not always included	Pass 1.5 More than one category of information sources is missing eg photos, interviews, websites. References given are not written out in full	Low Pass 1 Only 2 categories of reference information are given and not written in full	Not Shown 0

Subjects:

Geography

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric