iRubric: Comparing Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Cells rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Comparing Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Cells

Students will form expert groups to research the structure and function of the various organelles and cell components or a prokaryotic or eukaryotic(plant or animal) cell. Students will then return to a home group to share information and create a presentation discussing the differences between prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells.

Rubric Code: J4677A

By cobrero

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Science

Type: (Other)

Grade Levels: (none)

Cell comparison Comparing the structure and function of organelles of eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells.
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Eukaryotic cell (plant) 2 pts Show structure and describe function of each organelle or cell part.	Excellent Highly accurate representation of the cell. Cell parts are clearly and accurately labeled and represented.	Good Mostly accurate representation of cell. cell parts are clear and all represented.	Fair Representation of cell is not fully accurate. Not all cell parts are represented or are not clearly represented.	Poor Inaccurate representation. Not all cell parts represented and/or are not a representation of its parts.
Eukaryotic Cell (animal) 2 pts Show structure and describe function of each organelle or cell part.	Excellent Highly accurate representation of the cell. Cell parts are clearly and accurately labeled and represented.	Good Mostly accurate representation of cell. cell parts are clear and all represented.	Fair Representation of cell is not fully accurate. Not all cell parts are represented or are not clearly represented.	Poor Inaccurate representation. Not all cell parts represented and/or are not a representation of its parts.
Prokaryotic Cell 2 pts Show structure and describe function of each organelle or cell part.	Excellent Highly accurate representation of the cell. Cell parts are clearly and accurately labeled and represented.	Good Mostly accurate representation of cell. cell parts are clear and all represented.	Fair Representation of cell is not fully accurate. Not all cell parts are represented or are not clearly represented.	Poor Inaccurate representation. Not all cell parts represented and/or are not a representation of its parts.
Comparison of Cell Types 2 pts Describe the differences and similarities between cell types	Excellent Highly accurate comparison between organelles and cell parts of eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells. Includes many details of similarities and differences between cell types and subtypes.	Good Mostly accurate comparison between organelles and cells parts of eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells. Includes some details of similarities and differences between cell types and subtypes.	Fair Comparison is not fully accurate between organelles and cells parts of eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells. Includes few details of similarities and differences between cell types and subtypes.	Poor Inaccurate comparison between organelles and cells parts of eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells. Lacks details of similarities and differences between cell types and subtypes.
Presentation components
Verbal Presentation 1 pts	Excellent Highly accurate and appropriate grammar, maintained eye contact with audience, and maintained appropriate volume	Good Mostly accurate and appropriate grammar, maintained eye contact with audience, and maintained appropriate volume most of the time.	Fair Not fully accurate and appropriate grammar. inconsistent eye contact with audience and somewhat appropriate volume.	Poor Inaccurate and inappropriate grammar. Does not maintain eye contact with audience. Does not maintain appropriate volume.
Creativity/Effort 1 pts	Excellent Extremely creative design. Clever use of materials. Time managed well.	Good Creative use of materials that show very good planning, organization and hard work	Fair Shows some creativity in design. Use of materials show signs of planning and organization	Poor Little creativity seen in design. Problems with planning and organization. Poor use of time and/or materials
Neatness 1 pts	Excellent Extremely neatly displayed and labeled. Much effort and pride in presentation.	Good Neatly attached and labeled. Few smudges and presentation is easy to see and understand.	Fair Somewhat neat. Some effort in presentation and labels. Labels are fairly neatly written.	Poor Very messy. Labels are messy and difficult to read. Presentation is difficult to see or understand.
Group work 1 pts	Excellent Excellent team work. Group used time and materials efficiently. Highly organized and work was shared among all group members.	Good Good team work. Group used time and materials fairly well. Somewhat organized and work was shared among most group members.	Fair Fair team work. Group did not use time and materials wisely. somewhat disorganized and work was not shared fairly among all group members.	Poor Little team work. Group did not use time or materials wisely. Disorganized and some group members did not contribute to the project.

Keywords:

comparing cell types, prokaryote, eukaryote, jigsaw activity

Subjects:

Science

Types:

(Other)

Discuss this rubric