iRubric: Wiki Rubric for a collaborative project

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Wiki Rubric for a collaborative project

This is a rubric for marking a general wiki. Please add extra lines for assignment content.

Rubric Code: J458BA

By dburton

Draft

Private Rubric

Subject: Computers

Type: Project

Grade Levels: (none)

Wiki
	Poor 7 pts	Satisfactory 8 pts	Good 9 pts	Excellent 10 pts
Wiki Content
Content	Poor Minimal or missing content; contains factual errors. No details or examples.	Satisfactory Demonstrates some knowledge however contains errors. A satisfactory example is given.	Good Demonstrates essential knowledge with no factual errors. An example is present, useful, and appropriate.	Excellent Demonstrates in-depth knowledge. A relevant and effective example is given.
Organization	Poor Content has no logical organization.	Satisfactory Content has some logical organization.	Good Content is organized.	Excellent Content is very well organized and readable.
Creativity	Poor Uses the ideas of others and provides no original input.	Satisfactory Minor evidence of original thinking.	Good Shows evidence of critical thinking and originality.	Excellent Shows clear evidence of critical thinking and an original or creative approach to the task.
Citation (if used)	Poor Copies material without citing sources.	Satisfactory Does not give credit to most sources. Uses improper format for citing sources.	Good Gives credit to most sources. Uses proper format for citing format with minor errors.	Excellent Gives credit to all sources. Uses proper format for citing sources.
Accuracy	Poor Five or more errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar. Constant use of inappropriate abbreviations.	Satisfactory Some errors in punctuation, spelling or grammar. Some use of inappropriate abbreviations.	Good Errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar are rare. No use of inappropriate abbreviations.	Excellent No misspellings or grammatical errors and no use of inappropriate abbreviations or punctuation.
Collaboration
Contribution	Poor No contribution or minimal input to development of wiki; no comment on others' work.	Satisfactory Moderate input to development of wiki; little comment on others' work.	Good Adequate input to development of wiki. Makes comment on others' work.	Excellent Constant input to development of wiki. Effective and helpful comments on others' work
Wiki etiquette	Poor Student does not follow wiki etiquette.	Satisfactory Student sometimes writes/comments in an inappropriate way, but with some adherence to wiki etiquette.	Good Student mostly writes/comments in an appropriate way, with a general adherence to wiki etiquette.	Excellent Student always writes/comments in a wholly appropriate way, with a close adherence to wiki etiquette.