iRubric: Banning or Teaching? Ethical AI as a Classroom Skill rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Banning or Teaching? Ethical AI as a Classroom Skill

evaluation of presentation of a final project

Rubric Code: J252BA8

By amylmincks

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Bann or Teach? Ethical AI , a Classroom Skill
	Poor (N/A)	Good (N/A)	Excellent (N/A)
Purpose and Rationale 20 pts	Poor Purpose and rationale are unclear or missing; little to no supporting evidence. Audience has complete disconnect from presentation or relevance.	Good Purpose and rationale are somewhat clear; supporting evidence is limited or not fully convincing. Audience feels disjointed from purpose of presentation. Rationale is not adequately relayed to the audience.	Excellent Clearly states the purpose and rationale for exploring ethical AI; arguments are well-supported with evidence and clearly explain why this topic matters in education, and the classroom. Audience has clear understanding of relevance.
Practical Applications for Educators 20 pts	Poor Provides few or no practical applications; examples are missing or unrealistic. Audience is not given practical applications or can not utilize applications due to unclear design.	Good Provides some practical applications, but they may be general, vague, or only partially relevant. Audience can not use applications because they are not explicit and examples do not align.	Excellent Provides specific, actionable strategies for teachers to implement ethical AI in the classroom; examples are realistic and directly connected to the topic. Audience could implement AI in their classroom following presentation.
Use of Current Research 20 pts	Poor Research is outdated, missing, or not credible; little evidence supports claims.	Good Some current research is used; a few sources may be older than 5 years or not fully relevant. Sources do not support purpose, rationale, or practical application.	Excellent Presentation is based on credible research from the last 5 years, effectively integrated to support claims and examples. Sources directly support purpose, rationale, and practical application. Can be utilized by audience for further inquiry.
Engagement & Visual Design 15 pts	Poor Presentation is minimally engaging; visuals are missing or distracting; difficult to follow. Overall boring presentation.	Good Presentation is somewhat engaging; visuals and pacing are adequate but may not fully enhance audience understanding. Presentation has engaging moments, some usable information, but is overall disjointed.	Excellent Presentation is highly engaging: clear voice, strong pacing, interactive elements, and visuals/graphics enhance understanding for all audience types. Presentation keeps audience fully engaged, can be utilized for informational purposes as well as future trainings.
Grammar & Professionalism 15 pts	Poor Frequent grammar or spelling errors; language or formatting distracts from understanding. Appears to not be proofed; sloppy.	Good Some minor grammar, spelling, or formatting errors that do not distract significantly from comprehension.	Excellent Language is clear, precise, and error-free; professional tone and formatting throughout. Clearly presents a proofed presentation.
Organization & Clarity 10 pts	Poor Organization is poor; ideas are confusing or disjointed. Audience feels "lost".	Good Organization is adequate, but transitions may be weak or ideas occasionally jump. Audience has to clarify for understanding.	Excellent Information is logically organized, with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion; ideas flow smoothly and are easy to follow. Audience is able to stay engaged and utilize information with little to no clarification.

Subjects:

Education

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric