iRubric: Lesson Plan Evaluation Rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Lesson Plan Evaluation Rubric

Group 4: Amy, Nana, Virginia

Rubric Code: HB8B2

By amyheitzman

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: (General)

Type: (Other)

Grade Levels: Graduate, Post Graduate

Enter rubric title
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Design and Layout pts	Poor Design is confusing Elements interfere with effectiveness Difficult to read Details lacking	Fair Design is inconsistent Message not supported by design Details lacking	Good Design is thoughtful Elements are consistent and organized More details could be included to round out ideas and plans	Excellent Design is effective and easily integrates lesson parts Elements are consistent, well-organized, and support the content message Full spectrum of details included
Content Knowledge pts	Poor Essential question is not addressed Content is incoherent and difficult to interpret	Fair Essential question is not fully addressed Content lacks details	Good Essential question is addressed Most important parts of content included, but lack details	Excellent Essential question is discussed thoroughly, and from varied perspectives Essential question is posited cogently within the Unit
Technology Integration pts	Poor Lesson does not integrate technology Technology is used in an unsupportive way Technology does not support differentiated instruction	Fair Lesson integrates technology minimally Technology not used to potential Technology is only minimally involved in differentiated instruction	Good Lesson integrates technology in a handful of ways Technology is involved but not intuitively Technology supports differentiated instruction	Excellent Lesson integrates technology in a variety of ways Essential question is further explored via technology Technology supports overall and differentiated instruction
Assessment of Learning/Instruction pts	Poor Lesson outcomes unclear	Fair Lesson outcomes minimally presented	Good Lesson outcomes presented	Excellent Lesson outcomes presented tangibly and in a variety of modes
Mechanics, spelling, grammar pts	Poor Lesson plan has errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar, detracting from effectiveness Mechanics of language used is poor	Fair Lesson plan contains minimal errors in spelling, punctuation, grammar and mechanics	Good Lesson plan is error-free in spelling, punctuation, grammar, mechanics	Excellent Lesson is well-written, error-free, and is easy to read and comprehend
Connection to Standards pts	Poor Standards and/or benchmarks are missing from the lesson plan	Fair Standards and benchmarks are difficult to connect to lesson plan	Good Standards and benchmarks are not fully integrated into the lesson plan	Excellent Standards and benchmarks are clearly and thoughtfully integrated into the lesson design
Pedagogy pts	Poor Instructional planning processes are lacking Educational aims aren't supported by lesson activities	Fair Instructional planning processes are not clearly defined nor do educational goals tie to lesson activities	Good Instructional planning process is considerable, but could be more evidenced in plan Gaps exist between what is educational goal/outcome and classroom procedures	Excellent Instructional planning process is thougful, thorough and well-documented Classroom activities and procedures appropriately support essential questions, content objectives, and content

Subjects:

(General)

Types:

(Other)

Discuss this rubric