iRubric: Sensory Evaluation Project rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Sensory Evaluation Project

Conduct a sensory evaluation and present findings

Rubric Code: H92X5B

By beckyleonard

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Vocational

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Sensory Evaluation Project
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts
Division of Work 3 pts	Poor One group member contributed signifcantly more than an other.	Fair One group member seemed to contribute a bit more than the others.	Good Group members divided duties, contributed equally and worked well together.
Hypothesis 2 pts	Poor No hypothesis provided.	Fair A brief or obvious hypothesis is provided.	Good A thoughtful hypothesis is provided.
Process 3 pts	Poor Gathered input from less than 7 panelists or did not use scientific and safe food handeling methods	Fair Gathered input from 7-9 panelists using scientific and safe food handeling methods	Good Gathered input from 10 panelists using scientific and safe food handeling methods
Results 4 pts	Poor Mean, median, mode and range are not provided.	Fair Results are a bit difficult to understand. Mean, median, mode and range are provided for each attribute tested.	Good Results are presented in an easily understandable format. Mean, median, mode and range are provided for each attribute tested.
Conclusion 3 pts	Poor No clear conclusion presented.	Fair A useful conclusion is presented but does not directly answer hypothesis.	Good A useful conclusion is presented and it directly answers hypothesis.
PowerPoint 2 pts	Poor PowerPoint needs major improvement or contains less than four of the required slides.	Fair PowerPoint could be improved in appearance or only includes four of the five required slides.	Good PowerPoint is professional and well developed. All five required slides are included. Narration is appropriate.
Time Management 3 pts	Poor More than two instances were observed when group members were not on task before project was complete.	Fair No more than two instances observed when group members were not on task.	Good Group used their time wisely and completed work in timely manner. No time wasted before project was completed.