iRubric: Portland Coastal Fieldwork 2014 rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Portland Coastal Fieldwork 2014

Narrawong Coastal Fieldwork

VCE Unit 1 Coastal Fieldwork Bayview College Portland 2014

Rubric Code: H76BW8

By evieo8

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Geography

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: 9-12

Portland Coastal Fieldwork
	High Distinction (N/A)	Distinction (N/A)	Credit (N/A)	Pass (N/A)	Low Pass (N/A)	Not Shown (N/A)
Introduction (10)	High Distinction 10 9 Demonstrates a thorough understanding of the aims and methods. Excellent description of general characteristics of the both sites including similarites and differences	Distinction 8 Demonstrates a very good understanding of the aims and methods. Detailed description of general characteristics of the both sites	Credit 7 Aims and methods outlined. General characteristics of the both sites well described.	Pass 6 5 Aims and methods outlined. General characteristics of the both sites described briefly.	Low Pass 4 -1 One or more parts of the introduction missing.	Not Shown 0
Section 1 1.1 (5)	High Distinction 5 Base maps <BR> -displays all 6 BOLTSS<BR> - clearly shows and labels a wide variety of human features<BR> -clearly shows and labels a wide variety of natural features<BR> - clearly shows and labels a wide variety of features of all 4 spheres	Distinction 4 Base map <BR> -displays 5-4 BOLTSS<BR> - shows human and natural features greater variety and or better labeling could be added<BR> - features of all 4 spheres shown - greater variety could be added	Credit 3.5 Base map <BR> -displays 4 -3 BOLTSS<BR> -shows and labels 3/4 human and natural features <BR> -shows and labels features of 3/4 spheres	Pass 2.5 Base map <BR> -displays 3 BOLTSS<BR> shows and/or labels 2/3 human and natural features<BR> shows and/or labels features of 3/2 spheres	Low Pass 2 Base map <BR> -displays 2-1 BOLTSS<BR> - clearly shows and labels human features<BR> -clearly shows and labels human features<BR> - clearly shows and labels features of only 2/1 spheres	Not Shown 0
Section 1 1.2 (5)	High Distinction 5 Images of 4 spheres and other features<BR> 2+ images of each shown linked back to map<BR> - location of image is shown on base map<BR> - images are labeled and clear	Distinction 4 Images of 4 spheres and other features<BR> -1/2 images of each is shows and linked to map<BR> - location of image is shown on base map<BR> - images are labeled and clear	Credit 3.5 Images of 4 spheres and features<BR> -1 image of each is shows<BR> - location of image is shown on base map<BR> - images are labeled and clear	Pass 2.5 Images of 4 spheres<BR> -3/4 spheres & features have images - some missing<BR> -location of image is not shown on base map or <BR> images not labeled	Low Pass 2 Images of 4 spheres and features<BR> -not all sphere/ features have images<BR> -location of image is not shown on base map and<BR> images not labeled	Not Shown 0
Section 1 1.3 (5)	High Distinction 5 Annotate human impacts<BR> -6+ are listed and concisely and accurately described<BR> - wide variety of impacts shown<BR> - location shown	Distinction 4 Annotate human impact<BR> - 6 are listed<BR> - description could be more detailed/accurate <BR> - good variety<BR> - location shown	Credit 3.5 Annotate human impact<BR> 5 are listed<BR> - description could be more detailed/accurate <BR> - good variety<BR> - location shown	Pass 2.5 Annotate human impact<BR> 4/5 are listed but not well described <BR> - greater variety required<BR> - location shown	Low Pass 2 Annotate human impact<BR> 3 or less listed but not described or not described at all<BR> - lacking variety<BR> - location not shown	Not Shown 0
Section 1 1.4 (5)	High Distinction 5 Annotate management strategies<BR> -6+ are listed and concisely and accurately described<BR> - wide variety of impacts shown<BR> - location shown	Distinction 4 Annotate management strategies<BR> 6 are listed<BR> - description could be more detailed/accurate <BR> - good variety<BR> - location shown	Credit 3.5 Annotate management strategies<BR> 5 are listed<BR> - description could be more detailed <BR> - good variety<BR> - location shown	Pass 2.5 Annotate management strategies<BR> 4/5 are listed but not well described <BR> - greater variety required<BR> - location shown	Low Pass 2 Annotate management strategies<BR> 3 or less listed but not described or not described at all<BR> - lacking variety<BR> - location not shown	Not Shown 0
Section1 1.5 (5)	High Distinction 5 All 9 coastal features identified on map accurately and photographed on site. Excellent examples shown at one or more location. Good links shown.	Distinction 4 All 9 coastal features identified on map accurately and photographed on site. Good examples shown at one location only. Links made.	Credit 3.5 8 -7 coastal features identified on map. Photographs could be clearer or show better examples. Examples shown at one location only	Pass 2.5 6-5 coastal features identified on map. Photographs could be clearer or show better examples or not all photographs included.	Low Pass 2 less than 5 coastal features identified on map. Photographs could be clearer or show better examples or not all photographs included.	Not Shown 0
Section 1.6 (5)	High Distinction 5 All 7 coastal processes identified on map accurately and photographed on site. Excellent examples shown at one or more location. Good links shown.	Distinction 4 All 7 coastal process identified on map accurately and photographed on site. Good examples shown at one location only. Links made.	Credit 3.5 6 -5 coastal processes identified on map. Photographs could be clearer or show better examples. Examples shown at one location only	Pass 2.5 4 -3 coastal processes identified on map. Photographs could be clearer or show better examples or not all photographs included.	Low Pass 2 less than 3 coastal processes identified on map. Photographs could be clearer or show better examples or not all photographs included.	Not Shown 0
Section 2 2.1 (10)	High Distinction 10 9 Land use maps and graphs<BR> -demonstrates a thorough understanding of the concept<BR> Landuses mapped accurately with BOLTSS<BR> Landuses graphed accurately with SALTNA	Distinction 8 Land use maps and graphs<BR> - demonstrates a good understanding of the concept<BR> Landuses mapped accurately with most BOLTSS<BR> Landuses graphed accurately with most SALTNA	Credit 7 Land use map and graph<BR> - demonstrates a sound understanding of the concept<BR> map mostly accurate with some BOLTSS <BR> Graph mostly accurate with some SALTNA	Pass 6 5 Land use map and graph<BR> - demonstrates a basic understanding of the concept<BR> -Map or graph require greater accuracy<BR> -Few BOLTSS and/or SALTNA shown	Low Pass 4 3 2 1 Land use map and graph<BR> -concept not well understood.<BR> Map and graph require substantial improvement in accuracy BOLTSS and/or SALTNA	Not Shown 0
Section 2 2.2 (10)	High Distinction 10 9 Management agencies/groups<BR> -demonstrates a thorough understanding of the concept<BR> -All agencies listed in table and role thoroughly described	Distinction 8 Management agencies/groups<BR> -demonstrates a good understanding of the concept<BR> -All agencies listed in table <BR> -Description requires more detail	Credit 7 Management agencies/groups<BR> -demonstrates a sound understanding of the concept<BR> -Most agencies listed<BR> -Description requires more detail	Pass 6 5 Management agencies/groups<BR> -demonstrates a basic understanding of the concept<BR> Some agencies listed<BR> -Description requires more detail and/or has some inaccuracies	Low Pass 4 3 2 1 Management agencies/groups<BR> -concept not well understood<BR> very few agencies listed<BR> -Insufficient or inaccurate description	Not Shown 0
Section 2 2.3 (10)	High Distinction 10 9 Human activity management<BR> -demonstrates a thorough understanding of the concept<BR> - detailed description of process, results and management strategy given<BR> - extra effort eg diagram/map used	Distinction 8 Human activity management<BR> -demonstrates a good understanding of the concept<BR> - good attempt made to describe the process, results and management strategy	Credit 7 Human activity management<BR> -demonstrates a sound understanding of the concept<BR> - description of process, results and management strategy required greater detail an/or one element missing	Pass 6 5 Human activity management<BR> -demonstrates a basic understanding of the concept<BR> - description of process, results and management strategy is rudimentary and/or one element missing	Low Pass 4 3 2 1 Human activity management<BR> -concept not well understood<BR> - description is incomplete and/or inaccurate	Not Shown 0
Section 2 2.4 (10)	High Distinction 10 9 Natural process diagram & description<BR> -description demonstrates thorough process understanding <BR> -well linked to location<BR> -diagram detailed, accurate, skillfully drawn	Distinction 8 Natural process diagram & description<BR> -description demonstrates good understanding <BR> -linked to location<BR> -diagram detailed and accurate	Credit 7 Natural process diagram and description<BR> -description demonstrates sound understanding <BR> -linked to location<BR> -more detail required in diagram and/or diagram partly inaccurate	Pass 6 5 Natural process diagram and description<BR> -description demonstrates basic understanding <BR> - not well linked to location<BR> -diagram requires far greater detail and accuracy	Low Pass 4 3 2 1 Natural process diagram and description<BR> -process not well understood<BR> -diagram is poorly presented, difficult to interpret and/or inaccurate	Not Shown 0
Section 3 3.1 (10)	High Distinction 20 19 18 Visitor impacts<BR> -5+ diverse impacts identified<BR> - Description demonstrates a thorough understanding impacts<BR> - detailed, relevant and diverse description of management options given	Distinction 17 16 Visitor impacts<BR> -5 impacts identified but lack diversity<BR> - Description demonstrates a good understanding 5 impacts<BR> -description of management options required greater detail at times	Credit 15 14 13 Visitor impacts<BR> -5 impacts identified <BR> - Description demonstrates a sound understanding impacts and/or some impacts not described fully<BR> -description of management options requires greater depth and analysis	Pass 12 11 10 Visitor impacts<BR> -4 impacts identified <BR> - Description demonstrates a sound understanding of some of these impacts <BR> -description of management options requires greater depth and analysis	Low Pass 9 - 1 Visitor impacts<BR> -few impacts identified<BR> - concept not well understood<BR> -description of management options rudimentary or not included	Not Shown 0
Section 3 3.2 (10)	High Distinction 20 19 18 Spatial interaction natural<BR> -description demonstrates a thorough understanding of the concept<BR> - Annotation includes label and concise accurate description	Distinction 17 16 Spatial interaction natural<BR> - description demonstrates a good understanding of the concept<BR> -Annotation includes label and a good attempt at a description	Credit 15 14 13 Spatial interaction natural<BR> - description demonstrates a sound understanding of the concept<BR> -Annotation includes label, description requires more detail	Pass 12 11 10 Spatial interaction natural<BR> -description demonstrates a basic understanding of the concept<BR> -Annotation is rudimentary	Low Pass 9 - 1 Spatial interaction natural<BR> -concept not well understood.<BR> Not annotated	Not Shown 0
Section 3 3.3 (20)	High Distinction 20 19 18 River mouth change over time<BR> - description demonstrates a thorough understanding of the concept and the process<BR> - sketch is detailed, accurate, skillfully drawn	Distinction 17 16 River mouth change over time<BR> - description demonstrates a good understanding of the concept and process<BR> -sketch detailed and accurate	Credit 15 14 13 River mouth change over time<BR> - description demonstrates a sound understanding of the concept and process<BR> -more detail required in sketch and/or diagram partly inaccurate	Pass 12 11 10 River mouth change over time<BR> - description demonstrates a basic understanding of the concept and process<BR> -sketch requires far greater detail and accuracy	Low Pass 9 - 1 River mouth change over time<BR> -concept and process not well understood<BR> -sketch is poorly presented, difficult to interpret and/or inaccurate	Not Shown 0
Section 3 3.4 (20)	High Distinction 20 19 18 Spatial assoc natural/human<BR> -description demonstrates a thorough understanding of the concept<BR> - Annotation includes label and concise accurate description	Distinction 17 16 Spatial assoc natural/human<BR> -description demonstrates a good understanding of the concept<BR> -Annotation includes label and a good attempt at a description	Credit 15 14 13 Spatial assoc natural/human<BR> - description demonstrates a sound understanding of the concept<BR> -Annotation includes label, description requires more detail	Pass 12 11 10 Spatial assoc natural/human<BR> -description demonstrates a basic understanding of the concept<BR> -Annotation is rudimentary	Low Pass 9 - 1 Spatial assoc natural/human<BR> -concept not well understood<BR> -Not annotated	Not Shown 0
Section 3 3.5 (20)	High Distinction 20 19 18 Opening of River mouth<BR> - demonstrates a thorough understanding of the mouth opening process <BR> - flow diagram is detailed, accurate, skillfully drawn<BR> - wide variety of impacts thoroughly described and location shown	Distinction 17 16 Opening of River mouth<BR> -demonstrates a good understanding of the process<BR> - flow diagram is detailed and accurate<BR> -impacts described and location shown but could include more detail and variety	Credit 15 14 13 Opening of River mouth<BR> -demonstrates a sound understanding of the process<BR> -more detail required in diagram and/or diagram partly inaccurate<BR> -impacts briefly described and location shown	Pass 12 11 10 Opening of River mouth<BR> -demonstrates a basic understanding of the process<BR> - diagram requires far greater detail and accuracy<BR> -1/2 impacts listed and shown not described	Low Pass 9 - 1 Opening of River mouth<BR> -process not well understood<BR> -is poorly presented, difficult to interpret and/or inaccurate<BR> -1/2 impacts only listed not shown or described	Not Shown 0
Section 3 3.6 (20)	High Distinction 20 19 18 Yellow Rock waves<BR> Size and frequency measured and described accurately. Type accurate and justified. Wave reflection and refraction identified. surf conditions accurate, justified and annotated. Overall an excellent understanding	Distinction 17 16 Yellow Rock waves<BR> Size and frequency measured and described, accuracy could be impoved Type accurate and justified. Wave reflection and refraction identified. surf conditions accurate, justified and annotated. Overall an very good understanding	Credit 15 14 13 Yellow Rock waves<BR> Measures and descriptions demonstrate a sound understanding of the processes. Justification needs greater depth.	Pass 12 11 10 Yellow Rock waves<BR> Measures and descriptions demonstrate a basic understanding of the process. Not well justified.	Low Pass 9 - 1 Yellow Rock waves<BR> Wave process not well understood<BR> -is poorly presented, difficult to interpret and/or inaccurate	Not Shown 0
4 Conclusion (20)	High Distinction 20 19 18<BR> Table, comparison and explanation is thorough and based on evidence from the fieldwork<BR> -shows very strong links back to the aim<BR> - Extra research has added depth to the conclusion	Distinction 17 16 <BR> Table, comparison and explanation is well detailed and based on evidence from the fieldwork<BR> - shows strong links back to the aim	Credit 15 14 13<BR> Table, comparison and explanationis sound and mainly based on evidence <BR> - more detail could be provided<BR> - links to aim are not strong	Pass 12 11 10<BR> - A basic table, comparison and explanation are given which partially links to evidence<BR> - Few links to aim shown	Low Pass 9 - 1<BR> Table, comparison and explanation lacks detail, evidence and linkages to aim	Not Shown 0
Presentation (10)	High Distinction 10 9<BR> Presentation is consistently clear, neat and easily interpreted<BR> Mapping/graphing conventions used consistently<BR> Drawings are well prepared<BR> Photos clear/ relevant<BR> All labels shown<BR> Extra effort has been made	Distinction 8<BR> Presentation is mostly clear, neat and easily interpreted<BR> Mapping and graphing conventions mostly used<BR> Drawings require more detail<BR> Photos are mainly clear and relevant<BR> Labels shown in most cases	Credit 7 <BR> Presentation is mostly clear, neat and easily interpreted<BR> Mapping and graphing conventions used sometimes<BR> Drawings require more detail/labels<BR> Photos need more clarity or are not relevant to the topic<BR> Labels often not shown	Pass 6 5<BR> Presentation is inconsistent<BR> Mapping/graphing conventions rarely used <BR> Drawings/photos need improvement in clarity/labeling	Low Pass 4-1<BR> -Presentation is poor<BR> -Work is poorly organised<BR> -Diagrams/photos unclear and/or not well labelled<BR> -Graphing and mapping conventions rarely used	Not Shown 0
Spatial Concepts (10)	High Distinction 10 9<BR> - Excellent use of concept terminology at appropriate times<BR> -Responses demonstrate a thorough understanding of the concepts	Distinction 8<BR> - Good attempts are made to use correct terminology<BR> -Responses demonstrate a sound understanding of the concepts	Credit 7 <BR> Some attempts are made to use correct terminology<BR> -Responses demonstrate a basic understanding of the concepts	Pass 6 5<BR> Very few attempts made to use concept terminology<BR> - Responses demonstrate a basic understanding of the concepts	Low Pass 4-1<BR> Spatial concepts rarely used.<BR> -Responses do not demonstrate an understanding of the concepts	Not Shown 0

Subjects:

Geography

Types:

Assignment

Discuss this rubric