Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: The 6 Facets of Understanding - Group Discussion rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
The 6 Facets of Understanding - Group Discussion
Rubric Code:
H3XCA2
By
msanti19
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
(Other)
Grade Levels:
6-8, 9-12, Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
The 6 Facets of Understanding
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Explanation
Poor
A superficial account;
more descriptive than
analytical or creative; a
fragmentary or sketchy
account of facts/ideas or glib
generalizations; a black-andwhite
account; less a theory
than an unexamined hunch or borrowed idea.
Fair
An account that
reflects some in-depth and
personalized ideas; thestudent is making the work her own, going beyond the
given – there is supported theory here, but insufficient orinadequate argument or evidence.
Good
Provide an explanation on your own. Provide thorough and justifiable accounts of phenomena, facts, and data. Fully
supported, verified, and justified.
Interpretation
Poor
A simplistic or superficial
reading; mechanical translation,
a decoding with little or no
interpretation; no sense of wider
importance or significance; a
restatement of what was taught or read.
Fair
A plausible
interpretation or analysis of the
importance/meaning/significance;
makes sense of a story; provides
history and context.
Good
In order to fully interpret, one must be able to tell meaningful stories, offer apt translations, provide a revealing historical or personnal dimension to ideas and events; make subjects personal and accessible through images, anecdotes, models and analogies.
Application
Poor
Can perform
only with coaching or
relies on highly
scripted, singular
“plug-in” (algorithmic
and mechanical) skills,
procedures, or
approache
Fair
Able to perform
well with knowledge
and skill in a few key
contexts, with a limited
repertoire, flexibility, or
adaptability to diverse contexts
Good
One can effectively use and adapt what they know in diverse contexts. Students demonstrate application knowledge by “using it, adapting it, and customizing it”
Perspective
Poor
Unaware of differing
points of view; prone to
overlook or ignore other
perspectives; has difficulty
imagining other ways of
seeing things; prone to
egocentric argument and
personal criticisms.
Fair
Knows of different
points of view and somewhat
able to place own view in
perspective, but weakness in
considering worth of each
perspective, especially one’s
own uncritical about tactic assumptions
Good
Sees and hears points of view through critical eyes and ears; see the big picture. Perspective “involves weighing different plausible explanations and interpretations”. Look at it from an the point of views from others.
Empathy
Poor
Has little or
no empathy beyond
intellectual awareness of
others; sees things
through own ideas and
feelings; ignores or is
threatened or puzzled by
different feelings,
attitudes, or views.
Fair
Has some
capacity and selfdiscipline
to “walk in
another’s shoes” but is
still primarily limited to
one’s own reactions and
attitudes; puzzled or put
out by different feelings or attitudes
Good
Find value in what others might find odd, alien, or implausible; perceive sensitively on the basis of prior indirect experience. empathy involves the ability to "get inside" another's feelings, thoughts and world views. Consider the questions: how does it seem to you? What do they see that I don't? What do I need to experience if I am to fully understand?
Self-Knowledge
Poor
Generally
unaware of one’s
specific ignorance;
generally unaware of
how subjective
prejudgments colour
understandings.
Fair
Generally
aware of what is and is
not understood; aware
of how prejudice and
projection can occur
without awareness and
shape one’s views.
Good
Perceive the personal style, prejudices, projections, and habits of mind that both shape and impede our own understanding; they are aware of what they do not understand and why understanding is so hard. Self-knowledge is the wisdom to know one's ignorance and how one's patterns of thought and action inform as well as
Subjects:
Social Sciences
Types:
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Social Sciences rubrics
More (Other) rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.