Skip to main content
iRubric: The 6 Facets of Understanding - Group Discussion rubric

iRubric: The 6 Facets of Understanding - Group Discussion rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
The 6 Facets of Understanding - Group Discussion 
Rubric Code: H3XCA2
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric The 6 Facets of Understanding
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Explanation

Poor

A superficial account;
more descriptive than
analytical or creative; a
fragmentary or sketchy
account of facts/ideas or glib
generalizations; a black-andwhite
account; less a theory
than an unexamined hunch or borrowed idea.
Fair

An account that
reflects some in-depth and
personalized ideas; thestudent is making the work her own, going beyond the
given – there is supported theory here, but insufficient orinadequate argument or evidence.
Good

Provide an explanation on your own. Provide thorough and justifiable accounts of phenomena, facts, and data. Fully
supported, verified, and justified.
Interpretation

Poor

A simplistic or superficial
reading; mechanical translation,
a decoding with little or no
interpretation; no sense of wider
importance or significance; a
restatement of what was taught or read.
Fair

A plausible
interpretation or analysis of the
importance/meaning/significance;
makes sense of a story; provides
history and context.
Good

In order to fully interpret, one must be able to tell meaningful stories, offer apt translations, provide a revealing historical or personnal dimension to ideas and events; make subjects personal and accessible through images, anecdotes, models and analogies.
Application

Poor

Can perform
only with coaching or
relies on highly
scripted, singular
“plug-in” (algorithmic
and mechanical) skills,
procedures, or
approache
Fair

Able to perform
well with knowledge
and skill in a few key
contexts, with a limited
repertoire, flexibility, or
adaptability to diverse contexts
Good

One can effectively use and adapt what they know in diverse contexts. Students demonstrate application knowledge by “using it, adapting it, and customizing it”
Perspective

Poor

Unaware of differing
points of view; prone to
overlook or ignore other
perspectives; has difficulty
imagining other ways of
seeing things; prone to
egocentric argument and
personal criticisms.
Fair

Knows of different
points of view and somewhat
able to place own view in
perspective, but weakness in
considering worth of each
perspective, especially one’s
own uncritical about tactic assumptions
Good

Sees and hears points of view through critical eyes and ears; see the big picture. Perspective “involves weighing different plausible explanations and interpretations”. Look at it from an the point of views from others.
Empathy

Poor

Has little or
no empathy beyond
intellectual awareness of
others; sees things
through own ideas and
feelings; ignores or is
threatened or puzzled by
different feelings,
attitudes, or views.
Fair

Has some
capacity and selfdiscipline
to “walk in
another’s shoes” but is
still primarily limited to
one’s own reactions and
attitudes; puzzled or put
out by different feelings or attitudes
Good

Find value in what others might find odd, alien, or implausible; perceive sensitively on the basis of prior indirect experience. empathy involves the ability to "get inside" another's feelings, thoughts and world views. Consider the questions: how does it seem to you? What do they see that I don't? What do I need to experience if I am to fully understand?
Self-Knowledge

Poor

Generally
unaware of one’s
specific ignorance;
generally unaware of
how subjective
prejudgments colour
understandings.
Fair

Generally
aware of what is and is
not understood; aware
of how prejudice and
projection can occur
without awareness and
shape one’s views.
Good

Perceive the personal style, prejudices, projections, and habits of mind that both shape and impede our own understanding; they are aware of what they do not understand and why understanding is so hard. Self-knowledge is the wisdom to know one's ignorance and how one's patterns of thought and action inform as well as





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98