iRubric: Video Reflective Teaching rubric

No presentation (0 points)

Information presented does not correspond to the assigned topics: Group members introduction, Topic introduction (definitions and characteristics of each type of assessment), Three interviews (Two key questions to each person to explore their beliefs about both types of assessment), Conclusions contrasting their beliefs with the theory, Your opinions on what for and how can each type of assessment be used.

Questions did not answer the questions. Poorly developed task. (6 points)

Information presented corresponds to only a few of the requried topics.

Topics presented lacked development in most of the required aspects

Answers provided to the questions did not address the topic in any way. (12 points)

Information presented covered most ot the required aspects. Analysis was present but it was underdeveloped.

Answers provided to the questions were too general and did not clearly address the topic. (18 points)

Information presented covered all ot the required aspects. Analysis was evident and clearly presented.

Answers to the questions were answered but they lacked some development. (24 points)

Development of information, analysis and arguments was outstanding.
.

Answers for questions were sound and clear. (30 points)

No presentation (0 points)

Language was mainly limited and faulty. Messagase was unintelligible for most of the part. (2 points)

Langauge used in both oral and written deliveries was basic but it was possible to undertand parts of the information.

There were many pronunciation, grammar and/or spelling/vocabulary mistakes.(4 points)

Language in both oral and written deliveries was appropriate, message was fairly conveyed.

There were some pronunciation, grammar and/or spelling/ vocabulary mistakes that interfered with meaning. (6 points)

Language in both oral and written deliveries displayed a good command of language. The message was clearly transmited for the most part.

There were some pronunciation, grammar and/or spelling/vocabulary mistakes that do not interfere with meaning. (8 points)

Language in both oral and written deliveries displayed a high command of language. The message was clearly transmited at all times.

There were only a few pronunciation, grammar and/or spelling/ vocabulary mistakes that do not interfere with meaning. (10 points)