iRubric: Public Health Advocacy Holistic Rubric

The group presentation lacks organization or clarity and does not effectively educate the class. The current policies or gaps are missing or inaccurately described. No meaningful policy-level solution is proposed, or it is unrelated to the issue. Policymakers or leaders are not identified or are irrelevant. The sample communication is incomplete or missing, and the ANA-C Advocacy Framework is not applied.

The presentation is generally clear and includes basic information on the public health issue. Some relevant policies or gaps are mentioned, and a proposed solution is included but may lack clarity, feasibility, or strong alignment. Key leaders are identified with some rationale. The communication sample is appropriate but could be stronger in clarity or tone. The ANA-C Framework is referenced, but not all steps are clearly applied.

The presentation is well-organized, engaging, and effectively teaches the class about the issue. Relevant policies or gaps are clearly described, and a realistic, well-matched policy-level solution is proposed. Key policymakers or leaders are accurately identified with a strong rationale. The communication sample (letter, post, or talking points) is professional and persuasive. The ANA-C Advocacy Framework is clearly and correctly applied to guide the strategy.