iRubric: Cybersecurity Ethical Dilemma Debate rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Cybersecurity Ethical Dilemma Debate

Debate

PLTW Cybersecurity Activity 2.2.1 Step 2: Industrial espionage cyberattack.

Rubric Code: H23XA5B

By nfrederique

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Computers

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: 9-12

Cybersecurity Ethical Dilemma
	Poor 70 pts	Fair 80 pts	Good 90 pts	Excellent 100 pts
Research, use of evidence 30 pts Examples and facts are given to support reasons.	Poor Arguement is based solely on opinion, no facts were used.	Fair Only a few facts were used, but it is mostly based on opinion.	Good Information and sourses were cited, but some information/cites were missed.	Excellent Sources were cited for the entire debate.
Speech, organization and clarity 20 pts Viewpoints and responses are outlined both clearly and orderly.	Poor Voice is not loud, clear, confident, or expressive. Makes no eye contact with audience.	Fair Voice is sometimes loud, clear, confident, and expressive. Makes little eye contact with audience.	Good Voice is mostly loud, clear, confident, and expressive. Makes some eye contact with audience.	Excellent Voice is mostly loud, clear, confident, and expressive. Makes some eye contact with audience.
Understanding of Topic 30 pts Arguments made show good understanding of the topic.	Poor Research and speech show little or no topic understanding.	Fair Research and speech show a moderate level of topic understanding.	Good Research and speech show a good level of topic understanding.	Excellent Research and speech show a high level of topic understanding.
Creativity and Persuasiveness 20 pts Tone of voice, use of gestures, and level of enthusiasm are convincing to the audience.	Poor Language is basic and not persuasive. Little creativity or no "zingers" are used to prove points.	Fair Language is basic, but some points are made.	Good Language is interesting, creativity is used to prove points.	Excellent Language is engaging, creativity is used to prove points. "Zingers" are used to discredited the opponent.