iRubric: Connecting theme to characters rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Connecting theme to characters

Quality of Discussion

How well did each group do in connecting their assigned character to the theme of Appearance vs. Reality?

Rubric Code: GXC8WC4

By jonnyt1971

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Reflection

Grade Levels: 9-12

Appearance vs. Reality
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Group 1	Poor Students were unable to explain the theme, and/or could not give an example that connected to their character.	Fair Students seemed to understand the theme, but may have struggled to find examples of the character connection.	Good Students were able to understand the concept, and showed a basic understanding of a connection to the character. There is still room for deeper analysis.	Excellent Students were able to clearly explain the concept of the theme, and offered a nuanced response that showed understanding of the various layers of a character.
Group 2	Poor Students were unable to explain the theme, and/or could not give an example that connected to their character.	Fair Students seemed to understand the theme, but may have struggled to find examples of the character connection.	Good Students were able to understand the concept, and showed a basic understanding of a connection to the character. There is still room for deeper analysis.	Excellent Students were able to clearly explain the concept of the theme, and offered a nuanced response that showed understanding of the various layers of a character.
Group 3	Poor Students were unable to explain the theme, and/or could not give an example that connected to their character.	Fair Students seemed to understand the theme, but may have struggled to find examples of the character connection.	Good Students were able to understand the concept, and showed a basic understanding of a connection to the character. There is still room for deeper analysis.	Excellent Students were able to clearly explain the concept of the theme, and offered a nuanced response that showed understanding of the various layers of a character.
Group 4	Poor Students were unable to explain the theme, and/or could not give an example that connected to their character.	Fair Students seemed to understand the theme, but may have struggled to find examples of the character connection.	Good Students were able to understand the concept, and showed a basic understanding of a connection to the character. There is still room for deeper analysis.	Excellent Students were able to clearly explain the concept of the theme, and offered a nuanced response that showed understanding of the various layers of a character.
Group 5	Poor Students were unable to explain the theme, and/or could not give an example that connected to their character.	Fair Students seemed to understand the theme, but may have struggled to find examples of the character connection.	Good Students were able to understand the concept, and showed a basic understanding of a connection to the character. There is still room for deeper analysis.	Excellent Students were able to clearly explain the concept of the theme, and offered a nuanced response that showed understanding of the various layers of a character.
Group 6	Poor Students were unable to explain the theme, and/or could not give an example that connected to their character.	Fair Students seemed to understand the theme, but may have struggled to find examples of the character connection.	Good Students were able to understand the concept, and showed a basic understanding of a connection to the character. There is still room for deeper analysis.	Excellent Students were able to clearly explain the concept of the theme, and offered a nuanced response that showed understanding of the various layers of a character.

Subjects:

English

Types:

Reflection

Discuss this rubric