iRubric: Hwy 2 Bridge rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Hwy 2 Bridge

Students will build a strong, sturdy and safe bridge spanning the Wenatchee River using a limited number of construction (lego) pieces and causing limited impact on the surrounding environment

Rubric Code: GXC8677

By dailey

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Engineering

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 6-8

Hwy 2 Bridge
	Poor Missing most criteria in each section 1 pts	Fair Meets some criteria in each section, but is missing essentials 2 pts	Good Meets most of the essential criteria in each section, but may miss parts 3 pts	Excellent Meets all the essential criteria in each section 4 pts
Engineering Notebook	Poor Some parts of the Engineering Notebook were complete, but there were elements missing. Academic vocabulary relating to Structures was missing. Limited planning and thought were put into Notebook renderings and writings.	Fair Some parts of the Engineering Notebook were complete, but there were elements missing. Academic vocabulary relating to Structures was missing. Notebook renderings and writing show there was planning and thought throughout the process.	Good Some parts of the Engineering Notebook were complete, but there were elements missing. There was proper use of academic vocabulary relating to Structures. Notebook renderings and writing show there was planning and thought throughout the process.	Excellent All parts of the Engineering Notebook were complete. There was proper use of academic vocabulary relating to Structures. Notebook renderings and writing show there was planning and thought throughout the process.
Budget	Poor Most or all construction resources were used, bridge safety and durability was sacrificed.	Fair Most construction resources were used, yet there were some sacrifices to bridge safety and durability requirements. There were some pieces not used.	Good Many construction resources were used, yet bridge met safety and durability requirements. There were some pieces not used.	Excellent Minimal construction resources were used, yet bridge met safety and durability requirements. There were several pieces not used.
Blueprint	Poor Bridge design does not match the design of the blueprint and changes were not explained.	Fair Bridge design somewhat matches the design of the blueprint. If any changes were made during building, they were explained a little upon reflection.	Good Bridge blueprint mostly matches the design of the finished product. If any changes were made during building, they were sufficiently explained upon reflection.	Excellent Bridge blueprint matches the design of the finished product. If any changes were made during building, they were thoroughly explained upon reflection.
Durability	Poor Bridge design could not hold even a small amount of weight	Fair Bridge design could hold a small amount of weight (262g)	Good Bridge design held a lot of weight (525g)	Excellent Bridge design was strong and sturdy. It held a great deal of weight (700g)
Environmental Impact	Poor There was no regard for the surrounding environment or the habitat of spawning fish	Fair There was major disruption and damage done to the surrounding environment and habitat of spawning fish	Good There was some disruption and damage done to the surrounding environment and habitat of spawning fish	Excellent There was minimal disruption was done to the surrounding environment and there was no impact on spawning fish habitat
Safety	Poor No safety measures were in place for vehicle safety	Fair Minimal safety measures were in place for vehicle safety	Good Most of the bridge had safety measures were in place for vehicle safety	Excellent Safety measures such as railings were used and put in place for vehicle safety

Subjects:

Engineering

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric