iRubric: Final document - particle tech - final deliverable - 2018-2 rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Final document - particle tech - final deliverable - 2018-2

Ellutriator - particle tech - end deliverable - 2018-2

Students must hand in a 1st deliverable for a design project for particle technology engineering. this paper reports on production process from farm to packing of a staple product, rice, soy, beans, etc. process block diagram and other products and byproducts form the industry

Rubric Code: GXB8W94

By tebbiechale

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Engineering

Type: Writing

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Project deliverable Particle technology and engineering
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2.5 pts	Good 4 pts	Excellent 5 pts
Design component Silos 10 % Student effectively presented a design of their own	Poor The design is very basic, reduced to few values given for number, dimensions, geometry and capacity without good logic, taken from literature	Fair The design parameters were taken from literature, some values were given for some of the following: number, dimensions, geometry and capacity remaining logical	Good Students effectively used information presented in literature to help in the design, demonstrating the use of their own criteria for decision making for some of the following: number, dimensions, geometry and capacity remaining logical	Excellent Students effectively used information presented in literature to support their design of the silo, calculated number, dimensions, geometry and capacity logically
Design component transport 10 % Student effectively presented a design of their own	Poor Students presented selection of equipment with no dimensions or many of the stages requested were not included	Fair selection of equipment was given and explained, some dimensions were given, but not all stages of transport requested were complete	Good selesction of equipment was explained and logical, dimensions calculation or selection were given, most of the equipments are present	Excellent selesction of equipment was explained and logical, dimensions calculation or selection were given for all the equipments including auxiliary equipments
Design component GS 15 % Student effectively presented a design of their own	Poor The design is basically taken from information found in literature , but no input is given by students per se, even if stiched together coherently	Fair The design is very basic, reduced to calculations done in class without going any further towards calculating mass flow of fluids, and equipment sizing, concentrations, and others, few variables calculated	Good Students effectively used information presented in literature to help in the design, demonstrating the use of their own criteria for decision making in some small items, aproximations to mass flow of fluids, most pertinent variables calculated	Excellent Students effectively used information presented in literature to support their decision making regarding the design of the separation process, which was in great mesure designed by the students, mass flow of fluids and sizing of equipment are given.
Design component L-S 10 % Student effectively presented a design of their own	Poor The design is basically taken from information found in literature , but no input is given by students per se, selection or location may not be logical	Fair The design is very basic,without going any further towards calculating mass flow of fluids, and equipment sizing, concentrations, and others, few variables calculated	Good Students effectively used information presented in literature to help in the design, demonstrating the use of their own criteria for decision making in some small items, aproximations to mass flow of fluids, most pertinent variables calculated	Excellent Students effectively used information presented in literature to support their decision making regarding the design of the separation process, which was in great mesure designed by the students, mass flow of fluids and sizing of equipment are given.
Design component health and hazards 10 % Student effectively presented a design of their own	Poor Considerations were not included in the design, or are not logical	Fair Considerations are basic, not especific per area, sometimes just general for what should be considered, data and regulations are given but not used	Good The design includes consideration of proteccion systems for the plant and regulations not area or equipmenr specific and based on data and regulations	Excellent The design includes considerations for equipment and personal proteccion for specific areas and equipments, and are logically and supported by data and regulations
Block diagram and mass balance 10 % Student effectively presented a design of their own	Poor Block diagram or mass balance are incomplete	Fair Block diagram is incorrect, missing some minor stages, mass balance is missing service streams	Good Block diagram in mostly complete and logical, mass balance is mostly complete and logical, includes service streams, maybe some minor errors in logic here and there	Excellent block diagram and mass balance are complete and include service streams, values are coherent, and logical
Effort put forth 10 % All document content was written in english, figures and graphs were adapted or redone	Poor many images, tables and flow charts were taken directly from a secondary source and no translation was put forth for them, no effort was given to presentation	Fair a few charts, diagrams, tables or figures were taken from secondary sources with little translation attempt. Presentation was basic	Good One or two diagrams, figures, tables or charts were taken from secondary sources but are in english.	Excellent All charts, diagrams and figures were adapted by students or rewritten by them, and all are in english.
Organization and Grammar, 10 % Students show good grammar and spelling and logical skills	Poor There are so many errors the meaning is obscured. the text is not organizaed. Student obviously did not proof read the paper at all.	Fair Paper has many distracting errors. there are sections not organized logically. Perhaps some editing did occur.	Good There are occasional errors, but they are not too distracting and do not obscure the meaning of the sentence. document is organized enough to allow a general idea of the authors	Excellent Writing is free or almost free of errors. text is logically organized, the reader can foloww trough without going back and forth
Use of References 10 % Students show respect for authorship	Poor Student failed to cite sources. Very few references given throughout paper, even though the content clearly did not originate from the student.	Fair Although attributions are occasionally given, many statements seem unsubstantiated. Sources of information are unclear.	Good Professionally legitimate sources are generally present and attribution is, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. Student made a good effort at citing sources.	Excellent Compelling evidence from legitimate sources are given. Attribution is clear and fairly represented.
compliance with requisites 5 % WORD format, file name requisites number of pages of content calibri font, size 11, single line spacing, good presentation time, and items of content	Poor more than 4 items were not fulfilled	Fair 2-3 items were not fulfilled	Good 1 item was not fulfilled	Excellent all items requested were fulfilled

Keywords:

technical writing, literature review, science, engineering

Subjects:

Engineering

Types:

Writing

Discuss this rubric