iRubric: Triad Teacher Researcher Conference Proposal rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Triad Teacher Researcher Conference Proposal

Rubric Code: G94C4C

By jetomon

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

TTR Conference Proposal
	Potentially Revolutionary 5 pts	Worth Exploring and Sharing 4.5 pts	Requires Further Reflection 3.5 pts	Back to the Drawing Board 2.5 pts
Proposal Organization	Potentially Revolutionary Proposal includes all of the information required for the Triad Teacher Researcher Conference: name, email, school location, position, type of presentation, title, audience level, abstract, proposal, and permission to publish abstract to website. All word count requirements are met (50 words for abstract, 500 words for proposal). The intended audience is appropriate for the content of the presentation. All aspects of the proposal flow together to create a cohesive project overview.	Worth Exploring and Sharing Proposal includes all of the information required for the Triad Teacher Researcher Conference: presenter name, email, school location, position, type of presentation, title of presentation, audience level, abstract, proposal, and permission to publish abstract to website. All word count requirements are met (50 words for abstract, 500 words for proposal). The intended audience is appropriate for the content of the presentation.	Requires Further Reflection Proposal lacks some of the information required for the Triad Teacher Researcher Conference: presenter name, email, school location, position, type of presentation, title of presentation, audience level, abstract, proposal, and permission to publish abstract to website. The abstract and/or proposal may be too long or too short. The intended audience may be inappropriate for the content of the presentation.	Back to the Drawing Board Proposal lacks much of the information required for the Triad Teacher Researcher Conference: presenter name, email, school location, position, type of presentation, title of presentation, audience level, abstract, proposal, and permission to publish abstract to website. The abstract and/or proposal may be omitted or too long or too short. The intended audience may be omitted or inappropriate for the content of the presentation.
Project Title	Potentially Revolutionary Title is informative, succinct, and offers sufficiently specific details about the educational issue and variables of the research. It grabs the attention of a potential attendee.	Worth Exploring and Sharing Title is relevant, offering details about the proposed research and may or may not be attention-grabbing.	Requires Further Reflection Title lacks relevance or fails to offer appropriate details about the educational issue and variables of the research. It may or may not grab the attention of a potential attendee.	Back to the Drawing Board Title is omitted or inappropriate given the research problem and methods.
Project Abstract	Potentially Revolutionary Abstract is succinct (50 words or less), yet informative, explaining the purpose of the research and what an attendee might gain from listening to the presentation.	Worth Exploring and Sharing Abstract is relevant, offering details about the research purpose but does not clearly articulate what an attendee might gain from listening to the presentation.	Requires Further Reflection Abstract is too long or too short, providing too many or too few details about the nature of the project and what one might gain from listening to the presentation.	Back to the Drawing Board Abstract is omitted or inappropriate given the proposed research problem and anticipated outcomes.
Proposal: Purpose	Potentially Revolutionary Articulates a specific, significant problem by connecting that problem to real-world context.	Worth Exploring and Sharing Connects the research problem to real-world context, though the research might lack relevancy beyond the presenter's classroom.	Requires Further Reflection Although a research issue is identified, the statement is too broad or the description fails to establish the importance of the problem area. Connections to real-world contexts are unclear, debatable, or insignificant.	Back to the Drawing Board Statement of the problem, significance, purpose, questions/hypotheses, or definitions of constructs and variables are omitted or inappropriate.
Proposal: Methods	Potentially Revolutionary The purpose, questions, and design are mutually supportive and coherent. Attention has been given to eliminating alternative explanations and controlling extraneous variables. The description of the participants, setting, data collection, and analysis are clear enough to be replicated by others.	Worth Exploring and Sharing The research design has been identified and described in sufficiently detailed terms. A description of the participants, setting, data collection, and analysis have been provided.	Requires Further Reflection The research design is confusing or incomplete given the research question and sampling strategy. Descriptions of the participants, setting, data collection, and analysis lack sufficient detail.	Back to the Drawing Board The research design is inappropriate or has not been identified and/or described using standard terminology. Descriptions of the participants, setting, data collection, and analysis are omitted or inappropriate.
Proposal: Findings and Implications	Potentially Revolutionary Because this project has not yet been completed, anticipated findings and implications are addressed as "preliminary" or "anticipated." The proposed findings and implications are coherent and support the research purpose and questions.	Worth Exploring and Sharing Because this project has not yet been completed, anticipated findings and implications are addressed as "preliminary" or "anticipated." The proposed findings and implications are suffiently detailed	Requires Further Reflection Because this project has not yet been completed, anticipated findings and implications are addressed as "preliminary" or "anticipated." However, the proposed findings and implications lack sufficient detail or fail to connect to the research purpose and questions.	Back to the Drawing Board Anticipated findings and implications are omitted or inappropriate given the proposed research purpose and questions.

Subjects:

Education

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric