iRubric: Presidential Campaign Issues Rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Presidential Campaign Issues Rubric

Each group will research and report to voters on 8 topics.

Rubric Code: G82A72

By karimillerttm

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Social Sciences

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: 9-12

Presidential Campaign Issues Enter rubric description
	Excellent 5 pts	Average 3 pts	Poor 1 pts
Introduction	Excellent Slide contained name of candidate, purpose of presentation and group members. Image was purposeful. Font easy to read. Slide colorful and eye-catching.	Average Slide contained 2 of the following: name of candidate, purpose of presentation & group members. Image okay. Font okay. Slide okay.	Poor Slide had 1 of the following: name of candidate, purpose of presentation & group. Font hard to read. Image okay. Slide so-so. Somewhat blah.
National Defense Information	Excellent Topic was covered in depth. Information was accurate. Viewer could understand information without any narration.	Average Topic was covered with some depth. Information was accurate. Information was difficult to understand. Did not seem like information was completely original work.	Poor Topic was briefly addressed. Information inaccurate or too difficult to understand. Work did not seem to be original and was instead "borrowed heavily" with some citations.
National Defense Slide Presentation	Excellent Slide was easy to read. Slide was colorful. Slide had no misspellings Slide had no grammar/capitalization errors. Slide was creative. Slide had appropriate image.	Average Slide was easy to read. Slide was colorful. Slide had no more than 2 misspellings. Slide had no more than 2 grammar/capital. errors Slide image appropriate	Poor Slide difficult to read. Slide was bland with no color. Slide had more than 2 misspellings/grammar/ capitalization errors. Image inappropriate or no relationship to presentation.
Abortion Information	Excellent Topic was covered in depth. Information was accurate. Viewer could understand information without any narration.	Average Topic was covered with some depth. Information was accurate. Information was difficult to understand. Did not seem like information was completely original work.	Poor Topic was briefly addressed. Information inaccurate or too difficult to understand. Work did not seem to be original and was instead "borrowed heavily" with some citations.
Abortion Slide Presentation	Excellent Slide was easy to read. Slide was colorful. Slide had no misspellings Slide had no grammar/capitalization errors. Slide was creative. Slide had appropriate image.	Average Slide was easy to read. Slide was colorful. Slide had no more than 2 misspellings. Slide had no more than 2 grammar/capital. errors Slide image appropriate	Poor Slide difficult to read. Slide was bland with no color. Slide had more than 2 misspellings/grammar/ capitalization errors. Image inappropriate or no relationship to presentation.
Health Care Information	Excellent Topic was covered in depth. Information was accurate. Viewer could understand information without any narration.	Average Topic was covered with some depth. Information was accurate. Information was difficult to understand. Did not seem like information was completely original work.	Poor Topic was briefly addressed. Information inaccurate or too difficult to understand. Work did not seem to be original and was instead "borrowed heavily" with some citations.
Health Care Slide Presentation	Excellent Slide was easy to read. Slide was colorful. Slide had no misspellings Slide had no grammar/capitalization errors. Slide was creative. Slide had appropriate image.	Average Slide was easy to read. Slide was colorful. Slide had no more than 2 misspellings. Slide had no more than 2 grammar/capital. errors Slide image appropriate	Poor Slide difficult to read. Slide was bland with no color. Slide had more than 2 misspellings/grammar/ capitalization errors. Image inappropriate or no relationship to presentation.
Economy and Taxes Information	Excellent Topic was covered in depth. Information was accurate. Viewer could understand information without any narration.	Average Topic was covered with some depth. Information was accurate. Information was difficult to understand. Did not seem like information was completely original work.	Poor Topic was briefly addressed. Information inaccurate or too difficult to understand. Work did not seem to be original and was instead "borrowed heavily" with some citations.
Economy and Taxes Slide Presentation	Excellent Slide was easy to read. Slide was colorful. Slide had no misspellings Slide had no grammar/capitalization errors. Slide was creative. Slide had appropriate image.	Average Slide was easy to read. Slide was colorful. Slide had no more than 2 misspellings. Slide had no more than 2 grammar/capital. errors Slide image appropriate	Poor Slide difficult to read. Slide was bland with no color. Slide had more than 2 misspellings/grammar/ capitalization errors. Image inappropriate or no relationship to presentation.
Education Information	Excellent Topic was covered in depth. Information was accurate. Viewer could understand information without any narration.	Average Topic was covered with some depth. Information was accurate. Information was difficult to understand. Did not seem like information was completely original work.	Poor Topic was briefly addressed. Information inaccurate or too difficult to understand. Work did not seem to be original and was instead "borrowed heavily" with some citations.
Education Slide Presentation	Excellent Slide was easy to read. Slide was colorful. Slide had no misspellings Slide had no grammar/capitalization errors. Slide was creative. Slide had appropriate image.	Average Slide was easy to read. Slide was colorful. Slide had no more than 2 misspellings. Slide had no more than 2 grammar/capital. errors Slide image appropriate	Poor Slide difficult to read. Slide was bland with no color. Slide had more than 2 misspellings/grammar/ capitalization errors. Image inappropriate or no relationship to presentation.
Gun Control Information	Excellent Topic was covered in depth. Information was accurate. Viewer could understand information without any narration.	Average Topic was covered with some depth. Information was accurate. Information was difficult to understand. Did not seem like information was completely original work.	Poor Topic was briefly addressed. Information inaccurate or too difficult to understand. Work did not seem to be original and was instead "borrowed heavily" with some citations.
Gun Control Slide Presentation	Excellent Slide was easy to read. Slide was colorful. Slide had no misspellings Slide had no grammar/capitalization errors. Slide was creative. Slide had appropriate image.	Average Slide was easy to read. Slide was colorful. Slide had no more than 2 misspellings. Slide had no more than 2 grammar/capital. errors Slide image appropriate	Poor Slide difficult to read. Slide was bland with no color. Slide had more than 2 misspellings/grammar/ capitalization errors. Image inappropriate or no relationship to presentation.
Environment Information	Excellent Topic was covered in depth. Information was accurate. Viewer could understand information without any narration.	Average Topic was covered with some depth. Information was accurate. Information was difficult to understand. Did not seem like information was completely original work.	Poor Topic was briefly addressed. Information inaccurate or too difficult to understand. Work did not seem to be original and was instead "borrowed heavily" with some citations.
Environment Slide Presentation	Excellent Slide was easy to read. Slide was colorful. Slide had no misspellings Slide had no grammar/capitalization errors. Slide was creative. Slide had appropriate image.	Average Slide was easy to read. Slide was colorful. Slide had no more than 2 misspellings. Slide had no more than 2 grammar/capital. errors Slide image appropriate	Poor Slide difficult to read. Slide was bland with no color. Slide had more than 2 misspellings/grammar/ capitalization errors. Image inappropriate or no relationship to presentation.
Immigration Information	Excellent Topic was covered in depth. Information was accurate. Viewer could understand information without any narration.	Average Topic was covered with some depth. Information was accurate. Information was difficult to understand. Did not seem like information was completely original work.	Poor Topic was briefly addressed. Information inaccurate or too difficult to understand. Work did not seem to be original and was instead "borrowed heavily" with some citations.
Immigration Slide Presentation	Excellent Slide was easy to read. Slide was colorful. Slide had no misspellings Slide had no grammar/capitalization errors. Slide was creative. Slide had appropriate image.	Average Slide was easy to read. Slide was colorful. Slide had no more than 2 misspellings. Slide had no more than 2 grammar/capital. errors Slide image appropriate	Poor Slide difficult to read. Slide was bland with no color. Slide had more than 2 misspellings/grammar/ capitalization errors. Image inappropriate or no relationship to presentation.
Conclusion	Excellent Ending slide reiterated name, image and party of the candidate. Slide was eye-catching and made a statement.	Average Ending slide reiterated 2 of the following: name, image, party of candidate. Slide was so-so. Nothing too exciting.	Poor Ending slide reiterated 1 of the following: name, image, or party of candidate. Slide was boring. Not colorful. Blah.
Overall Presentation	Excellent Information and slides went well together. Presentation looked as if it was completed by one person, not a group. Transitions flowed. Teamwork was evident.	Average Seemed to be some segments where transitions from slide to slide was rough. Information seemed like it had been completed by individuals but spliced together somewhat cohesively. Some teamwork evident.	Poor Presentation obviously done by individuals with little regard for transitions. Each slide seemed to be a single entity only tied together by common candidate. No teamwork evident.

Subjects:

Social Sciences

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric