iRubric: Virtual Fieldtrip Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Virtual Fieldtrip Rubric

Rubric Code: G3684C

By linds461

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Social Sciences

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: K-5, Undergraduate

Enter rubric title
	Poor 13 pts	Weak 16 pts	Average 19 pts	Good 22 pts	Excellent 25 pts
Content	Poor NO EVIDENCE The presentation had insufficient information on the area of focus. Less than two people, places or events are mentioned in the presentation.	Weak The presentation had minimal information within each person, place, or event. Some people, places, or events were not explained to the audience. Some group members did not participate as much as others.	Average The presentation contains adequate information about either historical places, historical people, or historical events. Each group member participated in the creation of the presentation.	Good The presentation uses good detail when explaining a person, place, or event. Information was easy to follow, but lacked complete information within subjects.	Excellent The presentation has very in-depth information on the specified are of focus. Participation was evenly distributed among group members. People, places, and events were thoroughly discussed in the presentation.
Organization	Poor NO EVIDENCE The presentation does not have any organization. Less than two people, places, or events are mentioned in the presentation. There is no evidence of the presentation being led by a tour guide.	Weak The presentation seemed "thrown together." The topic jumped from place to place without fully explaining each person, place, or event. The presentation does not feel like it is being led by a tour guide.	Average The presentation flows from topic to topic. The presentation feels somewhat like it is being led by a tour guide. Information is somewhat rushed in the presentation, however.	Good The presentation is organized like a field trip, and is being led by a tour guide. The presentation was not rushed, but could have flowed better from one topic to the next.	Excellent The presentation really feels like a fieldtrip. Audio contains sufficient pauses in between each topic. The presentation flows nicely, and it feels like the virtual fieldtrip is led by a tour guide.
Creativity	Poor NO EVIDENCE The presentation does not have any audio or visuals to go along with the virtual fieldtrip.	Weak The presentation has minimal pictures and audio. The presentation lacked excitement and originality.	Average The presentation has adequate audio and visuals throughout the video. The project looks very similar to the example video on the curriculum page.	Good The presentation has good use of audio and video. At least one other teacher approved Web site was used, and the overall presentation shows some originality.	Excellent The presentation goes above and beyond what was listed in the project requirements listed on the curriculum page. Students researched other teacher-approved Web sites to use for their presentation. Excellent use of audio and visuals is demonstrated.
Participation	Poor The presentation was created mostly by one person. There is no evidence to show that you helped in creating the virtual fieldtrip.	Weak One or two group members were responsible for creating the presentation. Only one or two group members acted as tour guides.	Average All group members worked on creating the presentation, but only one tour guide was evident in the final presentation.	Good Work was distributed evenly among group members, but not all group members acted as tour guides for the presentation.	Excellent Work was distributed evenly among group members throughout the creation of the presentation. Each group member played the role of tour guide at least once during the presentation.

Subjects:

Social Sciences

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric