Skip to main content
iRubric: Spanish Language Presentational Speaking: MURDER MYSTERY rubric

iRubric: Spanish Language Presentational Speaking: MURDER MYSTERY rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Spanish Language Presentational Speaking: MURDER MYSTERY 
Spanish Language and Culture Presentational Speaking
Rubric Code: FXA8XC6
By kgotwols
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Foreign Languages  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Cultural Comparison
  Poor

1 pts

Weak

2 pts

Fair

3 pts

Good

4 pts

Strong

5 pts

Comprehensibility

Poor

Barely understandable, with frequent or significant errors that impede comprehensibility
Weak

Partially understandable, with errors that force interpretation and cause confusion for the listener
Fair

Generally understandable, with errors that may impede comprehensibility
Good

Fully understandable, with some errors which do not impede comprehensibility
Strong

Fully understandable, with ease and clarity of expression; occasional errors do not impede comprehensibility
Pronunciation and Intonation

Poor

Pronunciation, intonation, and pacing make the response difficult to comprehend; errors impede comprehensibility.
Clarification or self-correction (if present) usually does not improve comprehensibility
Weak

Pronunciation, intonation, and pacing make the response difficult to comprehend at times; errors impede comprehensibility.
Clarification or self-correction (if present) sometimes improves comprehensibility.
Fair

Pronunciation, intonation, and pacing make the response generally comprehensible; errors occasionally impede comprehensibility. Clarification or self-correction (if present) sometimes improves comprehensibility.
Good

Pronunciation, intonation, and pacing make the response mostly comprehensible; errors do not impede comprehensibility. Clarification or self-correction (if present) usually improves comprehensibility.
Strong

Pronunciation, intonation, and pacing make the response comprehensible; errors do not impede comprehensibility. Clarification or self-correction (if present) improves comprehensibility.
Vocabulary and Grammar

Poor

Very few vocabulary resources. Little or no control of grammar, syntax, and usage.
Weak

Limited vocabulary and idiomatic language. Limited control of grammar, syntax, and usage.
Fair

Appropriate but basic vocabulary and idiomatic language.
Some control of grammar, syntax, and usage.
Good

Varied and generally appropriate vocabulary and idiomatic language. General control of grammar, syntax, and usage.
Strong

Varied, appropriate vocabulary and idiomatic language. Accuracy and variety in grammar, syntax, and usage, with few errors.
Requirements & Treatment of Topic

Poor

Almost no treatment of topic within the context of the task and/ or the student is missing the requirements for the entire presentation. The student barely makes a minute in length, which is unacceptable given the time component.
Weak

Unsuitable treatment of topic within the context of the task and/ or the student is missing the majority of the requirements for an acceptable presentation. The student does not come close to meeting the time requirement.
Fair

Suitable treatment of topic within the context of the task. More than one of the requirements is missing; student does not meet the time requirement as well as the vocab. and/or verbs requirement.
Good

Generally effective treatment of topic within the context of the task. Student has 2 out of 3 irregular verbs, at least 1 vocabulary words from this chapter or the last. S/he falls a little short on the time requirement.
Strong

Effective treatment of topic within the context of the task. Student has 3 irregular verbs, at least 2 vocabulary words from this chapter or the last, and meets the time requirement of at least 3 minutes.
Organization

Poor

Little or no organization; absence of transitional elements and cohesive devices
Weak

Limited organization; ineffective use of transitional elements or cohesive devices
Fair

Some organization; limited use of transitional elements or cohesive devices
Good

Organized presentation; some effective use of transitional elements or cohesive devices
Strong

Organized presentation; effective use of transitional elements or cohesive devices
Effort

Poor

Student did not stay with, or refused to stay, within the group. Student would rather "work on his/her part at home." Student was both distracted and off task. Amount of effort displayed is unacceptable. S/he did not work well with others.
Weak

Student shows very little effort. S/he rarely stayed within the group, only to occasionally "checking in" on group members. Student was both distracted and off task. Amount of effort displayed is unacceptable.
Fair

Student shows minimal effort. S/he strayed from the group more than once, but at least s/he worked well with most members of the group throughout the allotted class time. Student was off-task about half the time.
Good

Student shows a decent amount of effort. S/he may have strayed from the group once due to distraction, but s/he worked well with all members of the group throughout the allotted class time.
Strong

Student shows a great amount of effort. S/he does not stray from the group--s/he worked well with all members of the group throughout the allotted class time.



Keywords:
  • AP, Presentational Speaking, Cultural Comparison


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16