iRubric: Interviews rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Interviews

Use for interview assignments

Rubric Code: FX5565

By joyk1nh

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: (Other)

Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12, Undergraduate

Interview Rubric
	Strong 4 pts	Effective 3 pts	Developing 2 pts	Emerging 1 pts	Points - 20 total (N/A)
Knowledge of Content	Strong Student clearly understands what the interview should be geared to Questions are extremely clear and drive or direct the interview.	Effective Student has a good general understanding of what the interview should point to and explain. Questions are clear but not specific enough.	Developing Student appears to have some understanding of what the concept is but their questions are confusing and may be confusing to the interviewee.	Emerging Student has just a minor grasp on the concept and their questions are not relevant.	Points - 20 total
Introduction	Strong Includes specific details that strongly support why the interview candidate was chosen. The person being interviewed should be shown as a close or obvious match with the subject chosen. The attention grabber is riveting.	Effective Includes details that show why a candidate was chosen for the interview. An attention grabber is apparent.	Developing With some work the reader is able to determine why the person was chosen to be interviewed. An attempt at an attention grabber was made.	Emerging The person interviewed and the subject of the interview appear to be unrelated. No attention grabber is attempted.	Points - 20 total
Question/Answer format	Strong The questions are specific and clear to the interviewee and the reader and help drive the interview direction.	Effective The questions are specific but not always clear to the interviewee. Clarification is required by the interviewee to understand what is being asked. The interview eventually gets to where it needs to be.	Developing The questions are not always clear or specific. The interviewee is somewhat confused. The interview drifts.	Emerging The questions are confusing. The interview never really reaches a conclusion.	Points - 20 total
Conclusion	Strong The conclusion ends the paper on a solid note and leaves the reader with a clear understanding of the intent of the interview.	Effective The conclusion is recognizable, but may be a bit vague, or leave some unanswered questions.	Developing The conclusion is very vague or may leave the reader sonfused as to what the writer is trying to get at.	Emerging The conclusion is very brief and there is little or no effort put forth in the closing paragraph.	Points - 20 total
Mechanics	Strong The interview has no mistakes (Spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar) that distract the reader. Quotes are used for both the questions and answers.	Effective The interview has a couple of mistakes that distract the reader or the use of quotes is not consistent.	Developing The interview has a few mistakes that distract the reader or the use of quotes is not consistent.	Emerging The interview has many mistakes that distract the reader or quotes are not used.	Points - 20 total
Interview

Subjects:

English

Types:

(Other)

Discuss this rubric