iRubric: ARTICLE REVIEW: SUMMARY AND CRITIQUE rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

ARTICLE REVIEW: SUMMARY AND CRITIQUE

A one page summary and critique of an article concerning a current educational science trend or issue. Students are required to read the article, summarize the key parts of the article as well as critique the article read.

Rubric Code: FX39674

By Winchesterc1

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Grand Round Webinar Report
	Not Evident (N/A)	Developing (N/A)	Evident (N/A)	Consistently Evident (N/A)
Summary webinar 1 25 %	Not Evident The student's understanding of the webinar is incomplete or has so many misconceptions that the student cannot be said to understand the topic.	Developing The student has a fair understanding of the information in the webinar that is important but has not included some of the key points and/or supporting details.	Evident The student has a good understanding of the webinar. Has highlighted most key points and appropriate supporting details.	Consistently Evident The student has a complete and detailed understanding of the webinar. Has highlighted all key points and appropriate supporting details.
Critique webinar 1 20 %	Not Evident The student does not construct a clear judgement about the webinar, or constructs one that is not at all supported by the specifics submitted.	Developing The student constructs a judgement about the webinar that has some relationship to the specifics, but the specifics do not totally support the generalization.	Evident The student constructs a valid judgement about the webinar and mostly explains, based on specifics (content, conclusions, etc.) identified from the webinar.	Consistently Evident The student constructs a valid judgement about the webinar and clearly explains, based on specifics (content, conclusions, etc.) identified from the webinar.
Summary webinar 2 25 %	Not Evident The student's understanding of the webinar is incomplete or has so many misconceptions that the student cannot be said to understand the topic.	Developing The student has a fair understanding of the information in the webinar that is important but has not included some of the key points and/or supporting details.	Evident The student has a good understanding of the webinar. Has highlighted most key points and appropriate supporting details.	Consistently Evident The student has a complete and detailed understanding of the webinar. Has highlighted key points and appropriate supporting details.
Opinion webinar 2 20 %	Not Evident The student does not construct a clear judgement about the webinar, or constructs one that is not at all supported by the specifics submitted.	Developing The student constructs a judgement about the webinar that has some relationship to the specifics, but the specifics do not totally support the generalization.	Evident The student constructs a valid judgement about the webinar and mostly explains, based on specifics (content, conclusions, etc.) identified from the webinar.	Consistently Evident The student constructs a valid judgement about the webinar and clearly explains, based on specifics (content, conclusions, etc.) identified from the webinar.
Overall Written Communication 10 %	Not Evident The submitted assignment demonstrates little or no attention to the use of necessary conventions of writing(spelling, grammar, organization).	Developing The submitted assignment demonstrates some attention to the use of necessary conventions of writing(spelling, grammar, organization).	Evident The student uses all necessary conventions of writing (spelling, grammar, organization) with few errors.	Consistently Evident The student uses all necessary conventions of writing (spelling, grammar, organization) without error.

Keywords:

Critique, Summary, Article

Subjects:

Types:

Assignment

Discuss this rubric