iRubric: PCD Contract Baking rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

PCD Contract Baking

Contract Baking

Develop a product to introduce for sale into a local upscale market.

Rubric Code: FX24478

By s_durfee

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Arts and Design

Type: Project

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Contract Baking
	Poor 1 pts	Average 3 pts	Excellent 5 pts
Formula	Poor Inaccurate or poorly made recipe yields a disappointing product. Product displays poor flavor and/or poor texture. Final product does not meet the standard in terms of overall aesthetics	Average Product meets reasonable expectations, but does not stand out in terms of flavor and texture. Final product meets expectations in regards to overall aesthetics	Excellent Product exceeds expectations for flavor, texture and aesthetics. Final product is exemplary in regards to overall aesthetics
Packaging	Poor Inadequate packaging design does not properly protect the product from direct handling. Package does not adequately build brand awareness Packaging does not have aesthetic appeal and is not integrated with the product	Average Reasonably well designed packaging meets minimum expectations for functionality and design Packaging has some aesthetic appeal and has some consideration with the environment.	Excellent Protects the product from dust, moisture gain or loss, direct handling Is aesthetically pleasing and environmentally responsible Identifies business and builds brand awareness
Costing structure	Poor Food cost is not accurately determined, thus leading to a grossly inaccurate costing structure	Average Food cost is not accurately determined, thus leading to a mildly inaccurate costing structure	Excellent Accurately determines the proper costing structure for the product
Competition	Poor Final product does not meet the minimal standards of flavor and texture, when compared to competitor's product.	Average Final product is consistent with the competition	Excellent Formula, packaging and yield exceeds that of the competition
SOP Manual	Poor Written SOP manual is poorly organized and has significant mistakes	Average Written SOP Manual has few mistakes and is reasonably easy to understand	Excellent Written SOP manual is easy to follow and understand
Oral Presentation	Poor Team displays basic understanding of the topic but does not make a convincing presentation Does not speak clearly or engage the audience	Average Team displays solid understanding of the topic. Presentation is convincing but team does not speak clearly or engage the audience	Excellent Student team displays mastery of the topic, is able to make a convincing presentation. Speaks clearly and to the audience Captures the attention of the audience

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric