iRubric: Electromechanical Shop Project Grading Criteria rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Electromechanical Shop Project Grading Criteria

To be used in vocational classes to assess how well students are able to apply theory knowledge to accomplish an assigned task.

Rubric Code: F4BW4B

By berryrs

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Vocational

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Shop Skills
	Excellent 50 pts	Good 40 pts	Fair 20 pts	Poor 10 pts	Unacceptable 5 pts
Wiring Project	Excellent The wiring project was 100% complete and worked according to the task description. All wire numbers were present. All wiring 100% neatly done.	Good The wiring project was complete and worked, but needed minor modifications. Some wire numbers missing. Wiring could be neater.	Fair The wiring project was complete but did not work; needed several minor modifications. Some wire numbers missing. Wiring could be neater.	Poor The wiring project was complete but did not work; needed several major modiications. Many wire numbers missing. Wiring could be much neater.	Unacceptable The wiring project was incomplete and did not work.
Powerpoint Presentation	Excellent Slide visuals are attractive.Text is legible. No grammatical errors. Information is at the advanced level and consistantly supports images. All of the required information is present. Excellent use of advanced features including animation.	Good Slide visuals are attractive. Text is legible. No grammatical errors. Information adequetly supports images. Most of the required information is present. Good use of advanced features including animation.	Fair Slide visuals are legible, but too much text is used on slides. Some grammatical errors. Information supports images at times. Some of the required information is present. Use of advanced features including animation not well used.	Poor The slides are not legible. The amount of text is too great for the space provided. There are several grammatical errors. There is little use of graphics or effects. The informatio does not consistantly support images. Little to none of the required information is present Advanced features including animation not used.	Unacceptable Powerpoint was not turned in.
Automation Studio Diagram	Excellent Top Notch work! Fully functional simulation of diagram. Proper sizing and alignment of all terminal numbers, wire numbers, rung numbers, components, and text. Professional quality. Extremely neat	Good Good quality work. Fully functional simulation of diagram. Most terminal numbers, rails, rungs, wire numbers, rung numbers, components, and text. are properly sized and aligned.	Fair Fair quality work. Mostly functional simulation of diagram or Some issues of improper sizing and alignment of all terminal numbers, wire numbers, rung numbers, components, and text. Could be neater.	Poor Poor quality work. Simulation of diagram does not function. Many sizing and alignment issues of terminal numbers, wire numbers, rung numbers, components, and text. Could be much neater.	Unacceptable Diagram was not turned in.
Ability to Follow Directions	Excellent Followed directions to the letter...perfect	Good Followed directions.	Fair Moderately followed directions.	Poor Did not follow directions.	Unacceptable Did not appear concerned with directions.
Demonstrated Knowledge of Theory	Excellent Student knows and is able to identify and explain necessary theories for completion of the project.	Good Student is able to identify and explain necessary theories for completion of the project with some assistance.	Fair Student is unable to identify or explain concepts without major prompting.	Poor Student is not able to both identify and explain major theories.	Unacceptable Student is unable to either identify or explain any related theories to the project.
Level of Needed Assistance	Excellent Student was able to complete the task without assistance.	Good Student was able to complete the task with little assistance.	Fair Student was able to complete the task with moderate assistance.	Poor Student was unable to complete task with major assistance.	Unacceptable Student was unable to complete task with assistance.
Time Management	Excellent Routinely used time well throughout the project to get the job done on time.	Good Used time fairly well throughout the project.	Fair Procrastinated somewhat but did get the job done on time.	Poor Was unable to adequately meet timeline due to inablility.	Unacceptable Did not meet timeline due to procrastination or wasting time.
Student Attitude During Project	Excellent Student turned in a project they considered a reflection of their diligent efforts.	Good Student turned in a project they are pleased with.	Fair Student turned in a project that is semi-decent to receive a fair grade.	Poor Student turned in project simply to receive credit.	Unacceptable Student turned in a project without concern for its reflection of their work.
Application of Safety Practices	Excellent Student followed all safety rules.	Good Student followed most safety rules, may have forgotten one.	Fair Student attempted to follow safety rules but failed to meet several.	Poor Student failed to follow a significant number of safety rules.	Unacceptable Student made no effort to follow safety rules.

Subjects:

Vocational

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric