iRubric: Seniors Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Seniors Project

Each learner will interview a senior (65+) and provide a report. The person interviewed and information collected shall remain confidential. You may select anyone you deem to be appropriate; family members and friends, for example.

Rubric Code: F45278

By KChapman

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Social Sciences

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

SOWK 1305 Seniors Assignment
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 3 pts	Good 5 pts
Overview	Poor Student provides minimal description of the person who was interviewed. Student provides information regarding three or fewer meaningful aspects of the person's life. Student fails to protect confidentiality.	Fair Student provides information regarding 4-6 meaningful aspects of the person's life.	Good Student provides information about 7 or more meaningful aspects of the person's life.
Historical Comparison	Poor Student fails to answer te question that is asked. Student provides fewer than three historical comparisons.	Fair Student provides information regarding 4-5 historical comparisons.	Good Student provides information about 6 or more historical comparisons.
Psychosocial Dynamics	Poor Student fails to answer the question that has been asked. Student discusses 3 or fewer psychosocial dynamics.	Fair Student provides a discusison of 4-5 psychosocial dynamics. Linkages are made between the identification of an issue and evidence to support that.	Good Student provides a discussion of 6 or more psychosocial dynamics. Linkages are made between the identification of an issues and evidence to support that.
Virtual Dementia Tour	Poor Student fails to answer the question that is asked. Student provides limited insight into the impact of the experience.	Fair Student provides some insight into the impact of the experience on both their professional and /personal self.	Good Student provides a thorough evaluation and significant insight into the impact of the experience on both thier personal and/professional self.
Services	Poor Students fails to answer the question that is asked. Student discusses two or fewer services that may be appropriate. Evidence to support the rationale for the service linkage is weak.	Fair Student discusses 3-4 services that may be appropriate. Evidence to support the rationale for the service linkage is sufficient.	Good Student discusses 5 or more services that may be appropriate. Evidence to support the rationale for the service linkage is strong.
Grammar and spelling	Poor Paper is poorly presented. There are numerous spelling and/or grammar issues. Professional presentation is significantly compromised.	Fair Paper is fairly presented but there are spelling or grammar issues that may reasonably compromise a professional presentation.	Good Paper is well written with none to few spelling or grammar errors. Professionalism of the paper is maintained.