iRubric: Hamlet Act 4.5-5.1 Character Committee Presentations rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Hamlet Act 4.5-5.1 Character Committee Presentations

Hamlet Act 4 Character Committee Presentations

Rubric Code: F24CB67

By ipabrams

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: 9-12

Enter rubric title
	Well-Developed 5 pts	Developed 4 pts	Developing 3 pts	Underdeveloped 2 pts
Quality of Ideas	Well-Developed Presents a coherent and insightful, interpretation of the assigned character's traits & motives and how this character sheds light on others and affects and is affected by the plot. Reveals knowledge of the play by presenting the complexity of the character - doesn't oversimplify or "flatten". Group fields any questions knowledgeably.	Developed Presents a coherent, pausible interpretation of the assigned character's traits & motives and how this character sheds light on others and affects and is affected by the plot. Reveals knowledge of the play by presenting the character accurately. Group fields questions, but answers may be specuative rather than knowledgeable.	Developing Presents an incoherent or implausible Interpretation of the assigned character's traits & motives and how this character sheds light on others and affects and is affected by the plot. Presentation does not reveal knowledge of the play; may be incomplete or significantly inaccurate	Underdeveloped Not enough to assess
Work with Text	Well-Developed Textual evidence is strong, thorough and relevant. Thoughtfully chosen evidence is insightfully analyzed in support of points about character. Goes beyond "translation" of lines to compelling analysis of the significance of specific literary devices and word choices .	Developed Textual evidence is thorough and relevant and analysis shows how evidence supports points about character. Goes beyond "translation" of lines to analyze the specific literary devices and word choices	Developing Textual evidence may not be well-chosen or relevant and is not analyzed to show how it supports points about chaarcter. Evidence may be "translated" rather than analyzed. Some questions may not use evidence in responses.	Underdeveloped Not enough to assess
Presentation	Well-Developed Slides/posters are clear, easy to read, and polished. (Sensible layout; no errors in conventions, etc.) Visual aids used when helpful. Group presents ideas clearly and coherently within time given, showing planning. "Air-time" shared among group members, all of whom appear prepared.	Developed Slides are clear and easy to read with minimal errors. Group presents ideas in a clear fashion, showing planning, but organization could be tighter and timing needs work. Group may rely too heavily on one or two members but all members present	Developing Slides may be less than clear or difficult to read and/or are in need of proofreading. Presentation is somewhat disjointed / unclear. Group members may lack confidence or may seem unfamiliar with the presentation.	Underdeveloped Not enough to assess
Individual Contribution	Well-Developed Comments during presentation reflect strong command of character. Understands and analyzesspecific language from the text in context of scene & larger play Strong communication with class - volume, inflection, eye contact, etc.	Developed Comments reflect competent reading of text and character. Analyzes some specific language from the text, but may ignore important context. Communication skills are adequate - volume, inflection, eye contact, etc.	Developing Comments somewhat vague on character and/or text. Missing explanations of specific language from the text. May not clearly communicate points.	Underdeveloped Not enough to assess

Subjects:

English

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric