- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Puck's Advice Column rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Puck's Advice Column Advice Column Rubric Code: F23A7B5 By VMcMonagle Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Journalism Type: Writing Grade Levels: 9-12

Advice Column Enter rubric description
	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Question Is there a clear question presented from the viewpoint of one of the MSND characters?	Good Clear, precise question stated with explanation	Fair Vague question stated, vague explanation	Poor Simple question stated, no explanation
Clarity Is the explanation easy to understand/ provides enough information to help the person asking? Is it written in the tone and language Puck would use?	Good Clear, detailed explanation; gives information to help solve the problem	Fair Vague explanation; not enough information to solve the problem	Poor Basic explanation given, no details
Requirement Are all the requirements present - salutation/unique name for both question and answer - Title/heading of advice column - Unique display	Good All of the requirements present	Fair About 75% of requirements present	Poor Less than 50% of requirements present
Grammar and Mechanics Does the paper indicate that the writer has control of the rules of spelling, grammar and mechanics?	Good The article contains no more than two errors. There is nothing in the spelling, usage or mechanics that is distracting to the reader.	Fair The article contains 3 or 4 errors in usage, spelling and mechanics, but they are not distracting to the reader	Poor The article contains 6 or more errors in usage, spelling and mechanics most of which are distracting to the reader
Text evidence Does both the question and answer include information like a quote, paraphrased details, or Shakespearean language from MSND?	Good Student used several examples that connect back to MSND with vivid and accurate detail.	Fair Student included adequate evidence of MSND in their project	Poor Student included little to no evidence of MSND in their project