Skip to main content
iRubric: Audio Art rubric

iRubric: Audio Art rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Audio Art 
Audio Art
Music Sonore Soundscape
Rubric Code: F228A35
By norita
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Video Art
  Excellent

10 pts

Good

9 pts

Average

8 pts

Limited

7 pts

Poor

6 pts

Concept, Idea, Follow-through

Excellent

Shows well thought out concept with a high degree of originality and sophistication. The audio is planned carefully; understanding of all concepts and instructions is clearly demonstrated.
Good

Shows good grasp of the concept with some originality and sophistication. The audio is planned carefully; concepts and instructions to be more clear or more strongly evident.
Average

Shows some grasp of the concept with commonly used cliché or stereotyped sounds. The audio is not clear and requires greater clarity through the use of visual elements and cues.
Limited

Lacks general grasp of the concept. Many of the audio elements and cues do not lead the viewer to the intended idea.
Poor

Lacks any grasp what so ever of the concept. Audio element and cues do not lead the viewer to the intended idea.
Composition & Design

Excellent

Shows strong internal integrity of the audio elements. Nothing needs to be added or removed. There is a very present pacing and flow to the piece.
Good

Shows internal integrity of the audio elements. Some elements may needs to be added, moved or removed. There is a start to a pacing and flow of the piece.
Average

Shows obvious weaknesses in the internal integrity of the audio elements. Many audio elements need to be added, moved or removed. Structure/pacing is lacking.
Limited

Audio is breaking apart - there is very little internal integrity of the audio elements. Most audio elements need to be rethought. There is no clear pacing or structure to the composition.
Poor

Audio integrity is nonexistent and audio is broken apart. All of the audio needs to be rethought. There is no clear structure to the pacing/composition.
Creativity

Excellent

The student demonstrates superior creativity and originality in the selection of the auditory components.
Good

The student demonstrates good use of creativity and originality in the selection of the auditory components.
Average

The student demonstrates average use of creativity and originality in the selection of the auditory components.
Limited

The student demonstrates some use of creativity and originality.
Poor

The student shows little evidence of creativity or originality in the selection of the auditory components.
Technical

Excellent

Shows mastery in the use of the audio editing process.
Good

Shows good command of the use of the audio editing process.
Average

Shows some command of the use of the audio editing process, but there are some things missing or lacking.
Limited

Shows limited use of the audio editing process, too simple and not enough complex editing.
Poor

Shows little or no command of the use of audio editing.
Effort

Excellent

Demonstrates excellent effort in accomplishing the assignment going the extra distance in editing and time spent to get the assignment done and on time.
Good

Demonstrates a good effort in accomplishing the assignment in research and time spent to get the assignment carried out.
Average

Demonstrates some effort in accomplishing the assignment.
Limited

Demonstrates limited effort in accomplishing the assignment.
Poor

Demonstrates little or no effort accomplishing the assignment.
Soundscape

Excellent

Demonstrates enough of creating an environment/soundscape to keep the listener drawn in, and successfully conveys the "idea" of creating an atmosphere. Description on blog is thorough and explanatory.
Good

Begins to show some evidence of environment/soundscape. Hints at some "ideas" of atmosphere. Description on the blog is present.
Average

Edits abstract the audio but audio is still very identifiable as a specific sound rather than an atmosphere/soundscape. A "mood" may be present, but it is cliche and un-refined. Description on blog is lacking.
Limited

Demonstrates very little evidence of environment/soundscape taking place. The audio is too linear and not enough caution is taken to distance it from it's source. Description on blog is missing or does not add to understanding of the piece.
Poor

A literal, linear audio experiment, rather than an environment/soundscape. Too few changes in audio and description does not add to understanding or is missing completely.



Keywords:
  • video, art, abstraction, 4d, audio, soundscape



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60