iRubric: Audio Art rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Audio Art

Music Sonore Soundscape

Rubric Code: F228A35

By norita

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Arts and Design

Type: Project

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Video Art
	Excellent 10 pts	Good 9 pts	Average 8 pts	Limited 7 pts	Poor 6 pts
Concept, Idea, Follow-through	Excellent Shows well thought out concept with a high degree of originality and sophistication. The audio is planned carefully; understanding of all concepts and instructions is clearly demonstrated.	Good Shows good grasp of the concept with some originality and sophistication. The audio is planned carefully; concepts and instructions to be more clear or more strongly evident.	Average Shows some grasp of the concept with commonly used cliché or stereotyped sounds. The audio is not clear and requires greater clarity through the use of visual elements and cues.	Limited Lacks general grasp of the concept. Many of the audio elements and cues do not lead the viewer to the intended idea.	Poor Lacks any grasp what so ever of the concept. Audio element and cues do not lead the viewer to the intended idea.
Composition & Design	Excellent Shows strong internal integrity of the audio elements. Nothing needs to be added or removed. There is a very present pacing and flow to the piece.	Good Shows internal integrity of the audio elements. Some elements may needs to be added, moved or removed. There is a start to a pacing and flow of the piece.	Average Shows obvious weaknesses in the internal integrity of the audio elements. Many audio elements need to be added, moved or removed. Structure/pacing is lacking.	Limited Audio is breaking apart - there is very little internal integrity of the audio elements. Most audio elements need to be rethought. There is no clear pacing or structure to the composition.	Poor Audio integrity is nonexistent and audio is broken apart. All of the audio needs to be rethought. There is no clear structure to the pacing/composition.
Creativity	Excellent The student demonstrates superior creativity and originality in the selection of the auditory components.	Good The student demonstrates good use of creativity and originality in the selection of the auditory components.	Average The student demonstrates average use of creativity and originality in the selection of the auditory components.	Limited The student demonstrates some use of creativity and originality.	Poor The student shows little evidence of creativity or originality in the selection of the auditory components.
Technical	Excellent Shows mastery in the use of the audio editing process.	Good Shows good command of the use of the audio editing process.	Average Shows some command of the use of the audio editing process, but there are some things missing or lacking.	Limited Shows limited use of the audio editing process, too simple and not enough complex editing.	Poor Shows little or no command of the use of audio editing.
Effort	Excellent Demonstrates excellent effort in accomplishing the assignment going the extra distance in editing and time spent to get the assignment done and on time.	Good Demonstrates a good effort in accomplishing the assignment in research and time spent to get the assignment carried out.	Average Demonstrates some effort in accomplishing the assignment.	Limited Demonstrates limited effort in accomplishing the assignment.	Poor Demonstrates little or no effort accomplishing the assignment.
Soundscape	Excellent Demonstrates enough of creating an environment/soundscape to keep the listener drawn in, and successfully conveys the "idea" of creating an atmosphere. Description on blog is thorough and explanatory.	Good Begins to show some evidence of environment/soundscape. Hints at some "ideas" of atmosphere. Description on the blog is present.	Average Edits abstract the audio but audio is still very identifiable as a specific sound rather than an atmosphere/soundscape. A "mood" may be present, but it is cliche and un-refined. Description on blog is lacking.	Limited Demonstrates very little evidence of environment/soundscape taking place. The audio is too linear and not enough caution is taken to distance it from it's source. Description on blog is missing or does not add to understanding of the piece.	Poor A literal, linear audio experiment, rather than an environment/soundscape. Too few changes in audio and description does not add to understanding or is missing completely.

Keywords:

video, art, abstraction, 4d, audio, soundscape

Subjects:

Arts and Design

Types:

Discuss this rubric