iRubric: Arts/Humanities Critiquing Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Arts/Humanities Critiquing Rubric

Students are asked to write a one to two page review or critique of a performance/visual piece of art. It should be clear what type of show/artwork was performed/created and the quality of the performance/artwork.

Rubric Code: EXXCX88

By BrandiKelley

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Humanities

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: 9-12

Performance Response Typed response to the "in school review" and "out of school review" using the adapted Liz Lerman Critical Response Process
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Statement of Meaning	Poor The response was poorly organized and showed little thought or insight. Sentences were incomplete and there were many grammatical errors. Very few opinions or descriptions of the performance/artwork were given. No terminology, explanations or facts were given for the opinions that were there.	Fair The response showed some thought, however it was poorly organized and had a lot of grammatical errors in it. Little terminology, explanations, or facts were given to support the existing opinions.	Good The response was well thought out and organized, however there were some grammatical errors in the composition. Opinions and descriptions of the performance/artwork were well done for the most part, and were explained with some terminology and facts.	Excellent The response was well thought out, organized and professionally written. Opinions and descriptions of the performance/artwork were tactfully written, and explained with terminology and facts.
Artist As Questioner	Poor The response was poorly organized and showed little thought or insight. Sentences were incomplete and there were many grammatical errors. Very few opinions or descriptions of the performance/artwork were given. No terminology, explanations or facts were given for the opinions that were there.	Fair The response showed some thought, however it was poorly organized and had a lot of grammatical errors in it. Little terminology, explanations, or facts were given to support the existing opinions.	Good The response was well thought out and organized, however there were some grammatical errors in the composition. Opinions and descriptions of the performance/artwork were well done for the most part, and were explained with some terminology and facts.	Excellent The response was well thought out, organized and professionally written. Opinions and descriptions of the performance/artwork were tactfully written, and explained with terminology and facts.
Neutral Questions From Responders	Poor The response was poorly organized and showed little thought or insight. Sentences were incomplete and there were many grammatical errors. Very few opinions or descriptions of the performance/artwork were given. No terminology, explanations or facts were given for the opinions that were there	Fair The response showed some thought, however it was poorly organized and had a lot of grammatical errors in it. Little terminology, explanations, or facts were given to support the existing opinions.	Good The response was well thought out and organized, however there were some grammatical errors in the composition. Opinions and descriptions of the performance/artwork were well done for the most part, and were explained with some terminology and facts.	Excellent The response was well thought out, organized and professionally written. Opinions and descriptions of the performance/artwork were tactfully written, and explained with terminology and facts.
Permissioned Opinions	Poor The response was poorly organized and showed little thought or insight. Sentences were incomplete and there were many grammatical errors. Very few opinions or descriptions of the performance/artwork were given. No terminology, explanations or facts were given for the opinions that were there	Fair The response showed some thought, however it was poorly organized and had a lot of grammatical errors in it. Little terminology, explanations, or facts were given to support the existing opinions.	Good The response was well thought out and organized, however there were some grammatical errors in the composition. Opinions and descriptions of the performance/artwork were well done for the most part, and were explained with some terminology and facts.	Excellent The response was well thought out, organized and professionally written. Opinions and descriptions of the performance/artwork were tactfully written, and explained with terminology and facts.
Submission Format/Date	Poor Maximum of 1 point may be received if the review is submitted in paper form OR over 3 days late	Fair Maximum of 2 points may be received if the review is submitted via Google Drive, but turned in to the wrong folder OR 2 days late	Good Maximum of 2 points may be received if the review is submitted via Google Drive, but is titled incorrectly. (IN-SCHOOL REVIEW or OUT OF SCHOOL REVIEW) OR 1 day late	Excellent Review was submitted via Google Drive, and was placed in the correct folder with the correct title for the particular review AND submitted by the deadline

Keywords:

Teachers: Mr. Butterfield (Music), Mr. Franklin (Dance), Ms. Jordan (Arts and Humanities), Ms. Law (Drama), Ms. Peugeot (Visual Arts).

Subjects:

Humanities

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric